2006-11-29 11:10:45 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As a person who voted for Bush both times and do not regret it, I still have to be honest and say the Bush is in no way qualified as a Supreme Court Justice. Some would argue he isn't qualified to be President, but he is head and shoulders above Al Gore, and head, shoulders, torso, hips and a couple of legs above John Kerry. He was the best choice of the three
2006-11-29 11:19:23 · answer #1 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Everything we can! Goodness, if Clarence Thomas can serve, President Bush should, too. Of course the name will have to change to the Inferior Court, but that's a minor point.
2006-11-29 11:24:39 · answer #2 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liberals! continually whining. i'm particular you have been happy with your cheating EX President. And once you get an excellent gamble attempt studying bearing directly to the election technique. Oh and course rigging voter machines replaced into an comprehensible errors, it is been the liberal education. i ask your self whether there could in no way been a shortage of flu vacines if Hiliary didn' t eliminate incentives of lawful scientific businesses. have you ever studied the outcomes of socialized drugs in Canada. There are people who could pay for therapy in the event that they have been allowed, yet nope, they might desire to die status in line. carry onto your effective liberalism, sometime it is you in desire and that i'm particular the government will step good up and help. New international order, tree hugging radical.
2016-10-13 09:36:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here is what you should do:
Write a letter to the next President of the United States.
You should then threaten to harm the President if he or she does not nominate Bush for the Supreme Court.
Make sure you cc: the Secret Service.
(I'll bet THIS response gets reviewed by Homeland Security!)
2006-11-29 11:18:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I doubt if he would want to be on he court. Like Gonzalez "Just said NO" to the court offer.
It's a lifetime position and the money is not as good as he could make in the NGO legal system.
Go big Red Go
2006-11-29 11:16:32 · answer #5 · answered by 43 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I support the President but he is not a qualified person to sit on the highest court in the land.
2006-11-29 11:14:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pray
Start a petition
Make "Bush on the Bench in 08" bumper stickers
2006-11-29 11:29:32 · answer #7 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that Helen Keller in her present condition would make a better Supreme Court Justice than George W Bush. I am taking into account that Hellen Keller was deaf, dumb and blind has been dead for 200 years.
2006-11-29 11:18:29 · answer #8 · answered by Samuel Crow 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush should NOT be appointied to the Supreme Court! He should never even been President.
He is the worst thing ever to happen to th US
2006-11-29 11:15:12 · answer #9 · answered by Brittany 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
We can ask the people of Iraq to show their gratefulness to the Great Liberator and take up a donation so we can send him to the University of Baghdad for law, where we will let them take care of George the way his daddy should have taken care of him years ago.
2006-11-29 11:29:19 · answer #10 · answered by justa 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋