On Stock bulletin board for PTN there are comments about their new sex stimulant drug PT-141. Many posts each day for several years. In one of PTN trial runs, they had users view porno. Nothing obscene mentioned. When I related that porno had been used in the trials, Yahoo censored the word " porno ". Yet, Yahoo allows obscene words all the time, yet censors this single word, which is not obscene, merely descriptive of material. Do you have right wing religious nuts protecting language? Grow up. Ordinary words
should not be censored, especially if not obscene. Infantile
mentality of limited brains.
2006-11-29 10:26:44 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
You know that no one from Yahoo is actually reading this, right?
2006-11-29 10:34:13 · answer #1 · answered by abfabmom1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i agree with you completely. they allow obscene talk, and censor everything that might be offensive without looking at it. but they are just trying to cover their *****. (they censor ***)
try joining the EFF http://www.eff.org/
2006-11-29 10:38:04 · answer #2 · answered by Flint 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋