I'd probably have MORE respect for you, cause you would be sort of vulnerable, and I would be more likely to actually talk to you and I wouldn't be intimidated by your 'hotness'.
2006-11-29 13:11:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Definitely. Just look at the Paul McCartney Heather Mills marriage. Poor guy.
2006-11-29 17:58:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yeah, I'd be attracted to you more if you not wear the prosthetic leg.
2006-12-01 21:16:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Secret901 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope. Is this a boy's question or something like that?
2006-11-29 17:59:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. But I'd probably ask you to smuggle drugs into the country. How many kilos do you think you could stuff in there?
2006-11-29 17:58:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Probably at first but, then I'd get use to you and take your leg so your wouldn't get away, thats if I was a guy....hee hee he
2006-11-29 17:58:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Whos your mama? 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Just so long as your not that lady that married Paul McCartney,.. Your not are you.
2006-11-30 03:46:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by zeroartmac 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
not at all
its how a person carrys one self
not if they have two legs or not
if your nice if your carring if your fun to hang out with
thats what matters
2006-11-29 18:04:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by BIG JOHN 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
no because if i love you from the core of my heart then there shouldnt be anything that would stop me from loving you or loveing you less, and i mean anything. then if something like that happen and i was diffent to you, then that wouldnt be love now would it. thats my opinion and thats what i live by, its one of my code.
2006-11-29 18:00:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by sweeper 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
no. I look at personality and morals. The rest is just window dressing and is not important.
2006-11-29 17:58:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by redpantyluver 4
·
0⤊
1⤋