is there really a bigfoot monstor?

Answer 1

Although I probably wouldn't call it a monster, I definitely believe the evidence indicates it exists. I guess it would certainly seem like a monster except to another Bigfoot. The evidence for Bigfoot goes back to Native American legends. The footprint evidence alone, for those who really understand it, is extremely compelling. The consistent reports of its behavior and looks is hard to explain. Certainly some of this could be due to seeing something on TV but I don't think it accounts for all sightings and certainly not the ones before TV. It is kind of sad to me that ignorance of this subject is so widespread. For me it is one of the most interesting of subjects.

The person who said that no hair or scat has been found is mistaken. There has been numerous hairs and scat found. DNA has so far been unsuccessful in determining origin. The typcial BF hair lacks a medulla which typcially contains the DNA. I do think that if someone could get a good hair with a root, it could be proved.

Someone said that the wife of someone was in the suit. Actually the wife of Ray Wallace was in a rediculous fur suit that wouldn't fool a 4 year old but the journalists failed to show the real suit and instead showed the Patterson film suggesting it was her. The New York Times and other journalist should have been able to figure this out but I guess they don't quite rate up to a 4 year old's intellect. Well in fact the NYT knew that the woman was in a different suit but it made a better story to suggest that she was the one in the famous film. The Wallace family is seeking to capitalize on their father Ray, who died recently and who produced numerous hoaxes. They have apparently even signed a movie deal with Judge Rheinhold. The story is interesting, but the greatest hoax of all was that he fooled all the journalist in the end. I really have no reason to think his family is pulling a fraud, they are just ignorant. Ray Wallace's wooden feet and fur suit were extremely amatuerish. He gained his interest after a bigfoot visited a construction site that he was contracted to construct, though not present at, above Bluff Creek in Northern California. The Patterson film showing a female bigfoot walking next to Bluff Creek, 10 years later is real in my opinion. It certainly wasn't Wallace's wife. His wife is probably in the suit on this link: http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2005/10/16/bigfoot_narrowweb__200x308.jpg

Answer 2

Probably not. Sightings have been reported from widely different places, including all over North America, but if they were real, wouldn't we have found hair, feces or other tangible evidence by now? A video was supposedly made of a "bigfoot" in Washington State, I believe, but it was later proved to be a hoax. Yeti, Wendigo, Bigfoot, Abominable Snowman...great stories for around the campfire, but alas, no truth to them.

Answer 3

No. The whole scam was uncovered some time back. The wife of the man who started this whole thing decided to come out with the truth when he passed away. He started this whole hoax and was able to keep it going for a long time. I never did believe it was true.

Answer 4

some scientists think this might be the link between cro magnon and modern man but like one witty doc once said " show me some bigfoot sh*t and I'll believe...."


Vin

Answer 5

Yes, he shaves himself daily and goes by the name Hulk Hogan.

Answer 6

yea, him, god and the Loch Ness monster have poker night every Thursday in Atlantis

Answer 7

well people say yes and people say no ,but i say yes because i saw a wet footprint on my driveway bigger than a regular human foot.

Answer 8

yes and their called ...teenagers

Answer 9

no

Answer 10

i think not

==========================================================
If you are single and have the time, please visit my site:
http://www.**************/go3.php