2006-11-29 08:26:38 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
yes i really do
2006-11-29 08:27:58 · answer #1 · answered by Tracy 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Not in the least.
You know, I have just finished watching a segment on the civil war and the Lincoln presidency.
Lincoln was a phenominal president but even his cabinet members, he general, and most of the congress spoke of him in very negative tones, like the gorilla in the white house, or the imbecile in the white house.
They acted as though he was retarded, and I thought 'Man, isn't this the same way that the current president is being treated and he will go down in history as being on the right side of every issue. Today they say that it is Carl Rove or Dick Chaney pulling G.W's strings. Not so, G.W. has shown extreme courage under great fire by the press and politicians.
He is even lambasted by leaders of countries that support terror, or are too chicken to fight the terrorists.
2006-11-29 16:36:13 · answer #2 · answered by Theophilus 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Not at all. Bush won't go down as the best president ever, but he was the best choice offered by either major party in 2004.
2006-11-29 21:12:42 · answer #3 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I voted for Bush. I'd do it again today. I stepped into the boots of a U.S. soldier, weeks after Saddam invaded Kuwait. I was ready & willing to defend the land and the people that I call home. I know in my heart, that the mightiest fighting force that the world has ever known, would rather be fighting terror in terror's backyard, than allowing more Americans to have to die at the hands of a cause that is so outdated. We don't go and kill hoards of people, going about their daily lives, in the name of our god. We try to promote FREEDOM!
2006-11-30 04:59:26 · answer #4 · answered by quikonfet 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't regret it in the least and would do it again in a heartbeat. What I do regret, however, was that the only choice we had was between Bush and Kerry. Why is it that we're always forced to choose from the better of two evils?
2006-11-29 16:37:06 · answer #5 · answered by KDdid 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No -- I do regret his decision to stay in Iraq. However, I think he has done a finer job than Kerry would have. Unemployment is down, the economy is strong, he supports the decision to re-work Social Security, he supported the ban on partial birth abortion and don't forget the money you recieive for the child tax credit (if you have children).
2006-11-29 16:33:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I would have preferred another Reagan. Given the choices available, I'm grateful President Bush remained in office.
2006-11-29 20:03:24 · answer #7 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. Kerry ranked number 20 out of 20 in popularity contest, survey yesterday.
2006-11-29 16:29:55 · answer #8 · answered by rallman@sbcglobal.net 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Nope. If Kerry were elected Iraq would no longer exist and would have been invaded and partitioned by Turkey, Syria and Iran.
2006-11-29 16:34:40 · answer #9 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I didnt and can not vote but if I did ... HELL, NO REGRETS for BUSH.
2006-11-30 05:11:37 · answer #10 · answered by Kiapa So 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope, because i didn't vote for him. but this is an interesting question. i would like to see how some of the people answer it.
2006-11-29 16:28:48 · answer #11 · answered by kimberly k 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋