My pastor says LIBS are evil but Michael Savage says they are just mentally ill. Should liberals be treated or should they just be killed?
2006-11-29 08:13:20 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If you listen to Michael Savage, let alone believe anything that fly's out of his lying pie hole, then it is you that has the disorder.
2006-11-29 08:15:53 · answer #1 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 9⤊ 4⤋
I can't buy that libs are evil, as a whole. They are at least in part, people who want to see suffering end, war stop, and poverty snuffed out. They are not mentally ill. A lot of them are very intelligent. The only thing liberals are is truly, completely and almost always wrong. Wrong on everything. Liberals believe that the gov't should be the force for social change, and the well being of all citizens. History shows that not to be the case. We are best left alone, and rose faster and more securely as a nation with a small decentralized gov't. Libs have worked to centralize and increase gov't for a long time.
Evil? Nah, just misguided.
2006-11-29 08:52:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
The question you posted is known in psychometric circles as a "forced choice." You are presenting only two choices, and forcing the answerer to choose between them, even though there may be many more and better answers to the question.
The choices you present are not necessarily the right ones.
2006-11-29 08:25:32 · answer #3 · answered by sparky52881 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ok, this is ridiculous. You are an easily led moron, apparently. Perhaps you should be killed or treated.
What a disgusting question.
Anyone who thinks this is cute should really ask themselves why they have to make an enemy of an entire group of people just because they feel morally superior based on hasty generalizations.
Oh, so sorry, GloryDays, that I threw someone's EXACT words of what should be done to me back at them. Try READING the QUESTION, then the answer. It's amazing how much more concise you sound then. Also, if you read ANY of my answers, you will see that I think that calling a group of people names because you don't agree with them politically is unintelligent and silly.
2006-11-29 08:18:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
You must have been listening to the mirror. Everything is backwards.
Based on Majority statics there are more liberals born than Hate mongers (I mean Redpublicans) That would make the Reds the oddity.
Go big Red Go
2006-11-29 08:18:52 · answer #5 · answered by 43 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
"Ok, this is ridiculous. You are an easily led moron, apparently. Perhaps you should be killed or treated."
Star your answer was disgusting. What kind of mental disorder do you have that would cause you to suggest that this man should be killed because he asked a question on yahoo answers.
You guys are just mad because you didn't think of conservitism is a mental disorder.
I guess it isn't silly to justify our actions because the other person did it first. Your above petty name calling yet you stoop to the same level as the person who asked the question.
2006-11-29 08:26:07 · answer #6 · answered by GloryDays49ers 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
How precisely does a Bush/McCain/Palin supporter unexpectedly become a "liberal"? final I knew, they and their supporters are on the conservative end of issues. nevertheless i'm particular you may deny it, the two sides have their share of drug customers. i think of you should be somewhat "mentally disordered" in case you could no longer see that the two sides signify variations of opinion. habit and way of existence alternatives do no longer unavoidably effect one's politics a hundred% of the time. all of us %. and decide what to have faith, who to have faith in. it incredibly is uncommon for any 2 people to agree thoroughly in all issues. Why ought to or no longer it incredibly is any diverse whilst comparing 2 separate political philosophies? it quite is basically by using compromise and tolerance that we are going to ever gain person-friendly floor. the only psychological ailment to be considered is on the two sides - whilst any are unwilling to bend. we are all entitled to our comments. yet having comments does not make us suited. And it does not entitle us to rigidity our comments on others, nor to venture onto them such characteristics as "psychological ailment." to place it in Christian words, did no longer God make the human race in his image? He sent his son, who taught us to "love thy brother as thyself." did no longer Moses get carry of a algorithm which would be enormously plenty summed up with the old Golden Rule? "Do unto others as you've got them do unto you." If all of us lived via this a million rule and saved far flung from labeling and phone calling our fellow guy, the international could be a non violent place.
2016-12-14 09:06:51 · answer #7 · answered by pfeifer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I bet your Pastor is on Meth and sleeping with Michael Savage in drugged out homosexual rages.
2006-11-29 08:17:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
you forgot to quote Ann Coulter. Now finish drinking the nice glass of kool aid you have been served and continue on the rest of your life without having any of your own thoughts.
2006-11-29 08:21:00 · answer #9 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Duh...yoos got a perdy mouth
2006-11-29 08:49:30 · answer #10 · answered by 76tb97t6ht 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋