English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does George W. Bush deserve to be impeached for deliberately misleading the American People about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? Did he deliberately mislead us about weapons of mass destruction intentionally? Does he bear the supervisory burden of responsibility for the negligence of subordinates to verify the validity of the intelligence before proceeding to send our armed forces into harms way?
http://www.sheck.com/polls/index.php?poll_id=6
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/01/1558044.php

2006-11-29 08:06:20 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

18 answers

Yes. I believe that he should be impeached because I believe that he intentionally lied to congress & us about wmd's; the man wanted to go to war with Iraq & used any means that he could to get us there.

I don't think subordinates were negligent re intelligence. I believe that Bush heard only what he wanted to hear. Many involved in intelligence have said this; either in interviews or books they've written.

Consequently he began what I, and many voters, think is an "unjust war." Just think of the deaths on both sides & destruction he is personally responsible for.....and he calls himself a Christian. I doubt he'll be impeached (democrats have already stated that its not going to happen) but I'm glad I believe in God; he'll have a lot to answer for when the time comes.

2006-11-29 08:19:04 · answer #1 · answered by Judith 6 · 1 5

"Did he deliberately mislead us about weapons of mass destruction intentionally?" Sorry, but that's a double negative, deliberately and intentionally mean the same thing.

Anyway, You people have to realize that war is not predictable and doesn't always goes exactly as planned. We know that Iraq had WMDs because we gave them to him fight the Iranians. But Saddam used them against not just soldiers, but civilians as well. So the Gulf War started to take him out of power as well as taking back the WMDs we gave him. So we knew that he had them at some point and was threatening the US with them, so were we just suppose to not take him seriously? What would you have thought about Bush then?

It seems like people just want any excuse to hate the government because Green Day made it the "cool" thing to do. I went to impeachbush.org to see what bias BS they were saying, and they had a counter of how many impeachment votes they had so far gotten. Currently they are just over 800,000 that's less than 3% of America, what an over whelming majority.

2006-12-01 10:10:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No. You should read "Future Jihad" by Walid Phares. He explains how the Saudis have bought their way into every Middle East Studies program in the US since the 1970's. There are no American experts which haven't been mislead by their Universities. Otherwise, we would understand Jihad and the threat against us. The news might tell us the truth and not blame every world problem on the US. Our country is relatively new. These problems are very old and on-going.

2006-11-29 08:17:30 · answer #3 · answered by Susan M 7 · 2 0

I guess Britain, France, Russia also deliberately misled the world when they also stated that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. I guess it also counts for nothing that at one time Saddam Hussein actually had weapons of mass destruction and used them on his own people, some of them being innocent, men, women and children. You want to impeach a man for a mistake he made trying to protect the American public?

2006-11-29 09:51:44 · answer #4 · answered by chefbill 3 · 1 1

YES, and for that person who said lying is not a crime yes it especially if your the president of the USA and that should be just one of the reasons for him to be impeached

2006-11-29 09:39:35 · answer #5 · answered by ????:/ 1 · 0 0

well if Bill Clinton gets impeached for becuasehe lied about his sex life then Bush should be impeached because he lied about the reasons of going to war.

2006-11-29 10:32:50 · answer #6 · answered by super steve 3 · 0 1

No he doesn't.

He's standing up for America and is doing the right thing.
He's also lowering taxes... YAYY!
We don't need the government to keep taking our hard earned money to give to the lazy poor jobless people.

SCREW YOU HIPPIES!!

2006-11-29 08:14:08 · answer #7 · answered by ( Kelly ) 7 · 5 1

No, he deserves to be applauded for all the bad press and manipulation by the liberal media.

2006-11-29 09:36:56 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 0 1

Probably but don't hold your breath. His screw up weren't sexy enough for congress to showboat around for the media.

2006-11-29 12:09:31 · answer #9 · answered by 4warned 3 · 0 1

Yes he does, but more than that: he, **** Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld should be sent to the Hague to face prosecution for war crimes! Lousy trio of jackbooted thugs!

2006-11-29 08:10:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers