Is America now more united than when George W started to restore dignity to the oval office?
2006-11-29 07:31:00 · 18 answers · asked by justgoodfolk 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The uniter label and claim were dropped as soon as the mission of electing George W was accomplished in early 2001.
2006-11-29 07:38:53 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I believe you are looking literally at the issue. Being a uniter does not mean that there can't be dissent. He has not been out there pounding away at Democrats, although he certainly could have. Cheney, of course, is a different matter. VPs typically do a lot more partisan rallying than the President, however.
The whole mission accomplished thing is a silly liberal poke in the eye. First of all, that banner was meant to be for the USS Abraham Lincoln on its return trip from 6 months in the mideast.
Second of all, if you are, like most crowd-following liberals, using this incident to laugh at Bush, you should ask yourself who is getting the last laugh. We're trying to win a @#$%^&* war, and our own citizens appear to be more interested in seeing us lose rather than contemplating the inherent dangers to all of us if we do. Trying desperately to score partisan points over what is a collective imperative for the free world, not just our beloved country.
2006-11-29 07:41:49 · answer #2 · answered by guy with a new horse 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush reported on the time that this replace into the top to considerable attempt against operations in Iraq. mutually as this assertion did coincide with an end to the standard element of the conflict, Bush's fact—and the sign itself—became arguable after guerrilla conflict in Iraq greater during the Iraqi insurgency. maximum folk of casualties, the two protection tension and civilian, have exceeded off because of the fact the speech.
2016-12-29 16:23:49 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This forum is a good example of American unity.
When Clinton was president. (Or should I say land lord of the Whitehouse) This Political forum was so divided it was nothing more than a few lines of C++
Bush has unitered us
Go big Red Go
2006-11-29 07:37:27 · answer #4 · answered by 43 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. It takes 2 to unite, 1 to divide. Bush has no partners on the other side of the isle to achieve unity.
2006-11-29 07:37:56 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Good questions and instead of the democrats bashing it is time for them to unite with America and stand for what is right!!
2006-11-29 11:36:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Time to wake up. This country has NEVER been united except when both parties were demanding action after the terror attacks on 9/11. How soon we forget...
Choir preaching to the choir again.
2006-11-29 07:36:56 · answer #7 · answered by Rich B 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bush was a uniter in Texas because the Texas Democrats were willing to work with him for the betterment of the people and the state.
But that didn't happen in Washington. The Democrats have opposed him fiercely every step of the way, even going out of their way to disagree with him. They have never worked with him and have never said a good thing about him, they have opposed his every initiative, even so far as to threaten to filibuster his nominiees - an unheard of, unprecedented action.
How could he unite with people who spewed hatred and vitriol at him at every step? He held his hand out to them, and he was spit upon by the Dems.
And you blame him for that? Un-be-lievable!
2006-11-29 07:46:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yeah - most people are united in thinking he's a fool. Republicans and Democrats are agreeing on something major.
Nice job, Bush!
2006-11-29 07:33:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
Mission accomplished!!! World opinion is now more united against us than at any other time in our history
2006-11-29 07:34:44 · answer #10 · answered by spicoli 3 · 7⤊ 3⤋