Allowed to keep the baby she has adopted ...?
yes or no ......and why ..?
2006-11-29 07:28:06 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I have thought long and hard about this and I think what she has done is completely wrong. I think this whole episode has been nothing less than a publicity stunt for Madonna, nobody else.
I think it is unethical to rip a child out of its culture and impose a Western culture on it simply because you have the financial means to do so. It's not as if the child is an orphan, it has a father.
I would have had far more respect for Madonna if she had used her personal fortune to set up an Aid Foundation to improve the lives of all the children in Malawi but allow them to remain within their own culture, and then campaigned to get all her rich celebrity friends to contribute to it. That would have been a lot less self-serving than the path she has chosen to follow.
2006-11-30 05:27:14 · answer #1 · answered by colliedug111060 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no reason why she should not be allowed to keep the baby, if she can provide him with a good home and a better environment to grow up in than he would have had in Malawi.
If she was not allowed to keep the child, then to whom would he go? Back to the orphanage to await another foster parent?
2006-11-29 07:30:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
? The Madonna Of the destiny. She seems marvelous! i won't be able to have self belief she's in her 50's. Madonna is the final residing legend of dad song. i think of... human beings nonetheless have not see something yet. destiny generations might have the possibility to work out that.
2016-12-10 18:31:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, if she moves there and learns the customs of Malawi, as every other prospective parent who wishes to adopt there is required to do. It's admirable that she wants to parent him, and likely he'd have a good life with her. But she must follow the laws of Malawi. There's no reason why she shouldn't be required to relocate there for the required 18 months - she certainly has the means to relocate there temporarily.
2006-11-29 07:32:44 · answer #4 · answered by LisaT 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Madonna can be a beautiful mother !! There are no reasons for not being allowed.....there are lot of childrens without houses and without love....so ...
........Why not ?
2006-11-29 22:38:52 · answer #5 · answered by dilenoalaspieles!NOaLASCORRIDASdTOROS 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
madonna is a fool and that woman should not be allowed to have children, she wants to help people i understand thats good but in this country we have so many kids in foster care and so many children that go to bed hungry every night how about she helps one of our own american children then in another country
2006-11-29 07:31:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes - every little bit helps.
If she can rescue one orphan from Africa and give it a comfortable home - that is a good thing in my book. I just hope that the little brat doesn't disappoint her.
2006-11-29 16:42:05 · answer #7 · answered by fatsausage 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i couldn't give you a yes or no because i don't know the real reason behind it i wasn't impressed at the time and i still feel the same now
2006-11-29 07:39:11 · answer #8 · answered by srracvuee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i dont see why she shouldn't like she is looking after the kid he'll have a good life and turn out never having to work a day in his life ever again....in other words he's on a pig's back!!!
2006-11-29 07:33:25 · answer #9 · answered by auto head 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who actually gives a shite?
2006-11-29 07:33:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋