Ok, after the last two intense political questions, I thought I'd lighten it up, so here's the question. The other day, my dog tryed to take the bus, he told me he was going to a park to hang out with the other dogs, he had the right change, and yet the bus driver wouldn't let him get on the bus. If he has the right change, why shouldn't he be allowed to ride the bus?
2006-11-29 07:25:23 · 6 answers · asked by Boggadee 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Darn that canine discrimination. Perhaps if he purchases a bus pass they will have to allow him aboard. Or better yet, he should get a job DRIVING the bus. That'll show them
2006-11-29 09:39:27 · answer #1 · answered by booksofstars 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In some places you can take your dog on the bus. In San Fran, as long as you have them muzzled and they pay the $1.50 everyone else pays, they can ride the bus. I wouldn't be surprised if soon it spreads around to other states or cities. In Chicago they are making it o.k. to take your dog to certain restaurants and even catering menus to the K9 species.
2006-11-29 15:31:35 · answer #2 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, if your dog was a "service" dog, there wouldn't have been a problem. He probably could have ridden for free- as long as his human companion needed a service dog.
So, regardless of having the right change or not, these are the facts, Jack.
2006-11-29 15:34:11 · answer #3 · answered by Lizzie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If your dog is that talented he shouldn't be riding the bus. Get him a limo and then let some else but you hear your dog talk....
2006-11-29 15:37:19 · answer #4 · answered by Babs B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they don't let dogs on because of health codes or something.
2006-11-29 16:49:15 · answer #5 · answered by Kayla [(Adam)] 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because he always sh!ts on the seats and pees on the poles.
2006-11-29 15:27:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋