Benedict Arnold, Reuters, and now the Associated Press?? American Traitors or patriots? And No! There is no point of view on this. Faked photos and quotes from enemy propagandists sources, Edward R Morrow is turning in his grave at this sedition!
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichelleMalkin/2006/11/29/the_rumor-mongering_media
2006-11-29 06:23:34 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
writers will always try to convince the reader to belive what they belive. that's why you are taught in writing class in college. If they could not write a good argument, they wouldn't be hired by the new york times etc..etc.
If they belive somthing in plictics or history, they might write a rather slanted artcile about it only giving the pros or ekse the cons of that particulllar isssue.
2006-11-29 06:31:06 · answer #1 · answered by NY Lady 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Re-write... and they really need to go back to actually checking sources, they just report anything from anybody these days, like the fake Iraqi policeman they quoted, who wasn't a policeman, and lied. Cute, and that was their basis for calling the current conflict a "civil war".
2006-11-29 06:26:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The media only reports what it wants the public to know Fox News for example
2006-11-29 06:29:57 · answer #3 · answered by quitoslady 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does any of this surprise anyone alive during Viet Nam. The media has been caught so many times on so many lies I don't even trust the weather channel to let me know the temperature.
2006-11-29 06:28:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
No seriously. They do both.
News used to be about informing people. Now, it's about persuading people because journalism has become a business.
So, if you can get more people to watch your news program, visit your website, read your "news" stories, then you get the ratings, and more money for you!
Sad and pathetic, I know.
2006-11-29 06:26:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The link doesn't seem to work, or is at least working very slow. I do see that it's to a Michele Malkin piece so I'm not going to bother. She is as biased to the right as you claim the AP is biased to the left.
2006-11-29 06:35:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
which could't take position as long as there are recommended human beings alive who surely save in ideas. various of heritage will take position on your human being lifetime. the version is in the way it affected you. information are information although the outcomes have many distinct aspects.
2016-11-29 22:38:39 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everybody tries to get the best story and the best pictures. And they always- don't tell the truth. Whats new?
2006-11-29 06:27:58 · answer #8 · answered by docie555@yahoo.com 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both, however as of the last 20 yrs, propaganda has replaced history, facts, and truth...
2006-11-29 06:26:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lets see..
Bush lies about Iraq..
Starts a war>>
History is made...
Faked--fact-lies--what??
traitor bush? treason? whatis it???
wire taps---spying on americans...on democratic party.....
violating civil rights of prisoners--murder of prisoners..
did media report history--rewrite hsitory--or did bush and white house gang surpress all truth??
2006-11-29 06:35:20 · answer #10 · answered by cork 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋