the arora which make in antartica
2006-11-29 05:42:35 · 15 answers · asked by adoablevaibhavgupta 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Well the answer to this is clearly. True.
Take care of the kids!
Good luck!
2006-11-29 05:45:25 · answer #1 · answered by Matt W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, this question doesn't make any sence. Sex is something biological organisms do to reproduce. Planets are large chuncks or rock or gasses in space.
Asking if planets have sex is like asking if my TV and ceiling fan have sex. Or my bathroom sink and my MP3 player have sex. Or my clock radio and my magic 8-ball have sex.
I'm getting some funny mental pictures so I'm going to say that the northern and southern lights are caused by energized particles from the sun hitting earth's magnetic field closer to the suface that average and dumping their energy then leave it at that.
Oh, it's like asking if my refrigerator and that saucy tart the microwave getting it on. Oh I slay me!
2006-11-30 10:43:01 · answer #2 · answered by moronreaper 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i might have a complicated time "explaining" astrology by making use of any clinical potential, as that's greater of a private theory device than a concept that makes predictions. even although, astrological predictions based upon the region of moon and stars on the time of beginning and consequently for the duration of one's life, could then have some invitation of credence. provided that huge bodies influence the gap time curvature, all incident EM fields could be "lensed" by way of those gravitational pertubations. subsequently, the EM fields incident upon all the physique/spirit on the different edge of the lens might have replaced, albeit infinitesimally. As gravity is an inverse cube potential "field" with admire to distance, the moon easily overpowers all different heavenly bodies in result. because of the fact the moon additionally has a gravitational field in lots nearer proximity to Earth, the Electromagentic lensing result additionally overpowers the tiny results of distant stars. Sol, our solar, is likewise without question, the main needed physique in terms of EM fields. attempting to scientifically clarify Astrology as the two the residual gravitational result or by making use of distinctive function of the EM fields of the planets and stars isn't available because of the large distance between Earth and those components, rather in assessment to the Moon.
2016-12-13 16:51:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. when planets are very close and have almost equal mass, due to gravitational force, a part of both the planets gets separated from thier planets and the 2 separated parts mix to form another planet.
aurora has nothing to do with this.
the question was good but the way u formed it was unhealthy
2006-11-29 23:02:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What the hell, what kind of question is that. The people before me made clear, "Planets" and "sex", the two words just don't make sense together. Moreover, the aurora isn't the result of 'sex'.
2006-11-29 05:50:43 · answer #5 · answered by Guess who? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The planets are too far apart for any meaningful interaction of that sort.
2006-11-29 06:53:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah I guess so But this is a weird question and asked it kind of a perverted way oh well.
2006-11-29 05:53:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uh, yeah. That's where asteroids come from.
2006-11-29 05:47:00 · answer #8 · answered by faversham 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
let us suppose they can but where the organs situated and how would they insert
2006-11-29 21:19:01 · answer #9 · answered by sidd the devil 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are u MAD.do't u have some sensible and public asking questions????IDEOT
2006-12-02 00:31:49 · answer #10 · answered by nicky 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋