no
2006-11-29 04:48:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sgt. Pepper 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
All racists (regardless of their pores and skin coloration) come from the shallow end of the gene pool. Lina H is a chief occasion. In authentic existence, she's in all hazard the colour of pitch, yet her gene pool could certainly use some chlorination.
2016-10-04 12:38:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it is not meant as a reference to race, but to clothing color! White is traditionally a spring/summer color, and was not considered acceptable "proper" wear after labor day. it is a very artifical and arbitrary clothing/fashion rule, but it is not racist.
2006-11-29 04:48:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by harpertara 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Stop it. Honestly that's weak. Really now racist? No. God Bless. Love. Amen (seriously seek God confess sins and give all to him, you'll have better questions).
2006-11-29 04:52:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not racist they are talking about the color of your clothing. And just so you know, that's no longer followed in fashion circles.
2006-11-29 04:48:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
its not at all racist, it only means clothing not people, anyway where not white it's more like peachand pink mixed together
2006-11-29 04:51:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by jennifer c 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you think it sounds racist, I think you are a little too sensitive on that subject.
2006-11-29 04:54:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nosy Parker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, your thinking too much into it. It is only refered to clothes. Why would anyone think anything like that?
2006-11-29 04:56:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by azn_butterfly2124 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
2006-11-29 04:48:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Radagast97 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope it doesnt
2006-11-29 05:10:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rican87 3
·
0⤊
0⤋