2006-11-29 04:10:31 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ok from some of the answers i'm getting and i won't name names, i'll clarify, i'm doing a paper of why i'm against the war for my sociology class, and i didn't mean like winning or losing a game. i ment who stops last, so if anyone needs any more clarifacation let me know, and i'm not going to do the dems. against the rep.
2006-11-29 08:02:25 · update #1
Many Democrats want us to lose.
BUT, we haven't lost yet.
2006-11-29 04:13:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
No he did the right thing ........stopping at the Iraq border.I think he had more smarts than his kid and realized what a mess it would be
Have the damn terrorists already won?
The goal of terrorists is to change the social order. The ONLY way to "shake things up" and change a society is to do outrageous things in public - either through peaceful protests or violence. Ghandi and hippies were sucessfull with peace, and now the Al Queda is sucessfull with violence. For the measly price of a couple of million dollars (or less), Al Queda has caused the USA to spend hundreds of billions , The terrorists have succeeded in changing society - making it more paranoid and less free. The terrorists have succeeded in making the USA MORE of a paria state - with the entire world hating US (not "them"). They have succeeded in bogging us down in a questionable war (although parallels to vietnam are unwarranted, as we lost at LEAST 1600 soldiers a MONTH in vietnam). I'm sure that members of Al Queda KNEW that many would be caught - since its hard to hide from someone with unlimited resources - but to wreak so much havoc on your enemy, it is a small price to pay.
2006-11-29 12:13:43 · answer #2 · answered by Paul I 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I can not help but believe that G.H.W. Bush was related to Gerald Ford in some manner or another - completely obtuse - both of them.
I am the Fringe and Bush-league presidents are not good for America.
2006-11-29 12:25:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Let me think....
Ahhhh - No.
Congress by a 98% vote decided to start a war.
When you hear the word liberal - think looser. Only Liberals think we are going to loose.
--and to the idiot who thinks you can't win a war - ask the Germans and the Italians and the Japanese if it is possible to loose a war. Does your kindergarden teacher know you are out?
2006-11-29 12:30:12 · answer #4 · answered by Zee HatMan 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Has there ever really been a winner or loser in war? Don't both sides spend time, money and energy to fight? Don't both sides suffer deaths? You don't win a war, you kill the other side until they can't or won't fight anymore. Everyone loses in war. Call me a crybaby pacifist if you will, you know I'm right though.
2006-11-29 12:17:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You are correct. Sr. was defeated just like Jr. is being defeated. The family and friends are in the war business!
Win or lose they still make money and that is all that matters.
2006-11-29 12:27:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I thought he did the right thing at the time, stopping where he did. But now I think he should have finished the job. Unfortunately his kid went in to do it for him and now we have the biggest mess on our hands since Vietnam, maybe bigger.
2006-11-29 12:31:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the middle east had no oil, no one would even notice. If a tree fell in the woods and no one was around to hear it fall, did it make a noise?
Is a bear a catholic?
does the pope **** in the woods?
2006-11-29 12:15:27 · answer #8 · answered by sanchezmikea 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes and it seems like the Bushes have monopolised
this habit. What father can do son can do better, cheating
that is.
2006-11-29 12:22:20 · answer #9 · answered by CAPTAIN BEAR 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, he did not.
Thank you very much, while you're up.
2006-11-29 12:13:51 · answer #10 · answered by producer_vortex 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋