Bush wont even talk to him.
2006-11-29 04:03:25 · 21 answers · asked by paulisfree2004 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
bush won't talk to him because he knows that Ahmadinejad is much, much smarter than him. I think a Battle Royal would be the way to go. I would liek to see bush physically get his *** kicked, rather than mentally like we have seen for 6 years.
2006-11-29 04:06:24 · answer #1 · answered by Jon C 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
King Solomon said the curse of the rich-man is that no matter how hard he works in life. His son might be a fool.
It is truly a sad element of American society, that our president has limited command of the English language. That is why Tony Blair used to explain things to the World for Bush. It's sad that they are parting company.
If Ahmadinejad, would allow Blair to accompany Bush they might have a possibility of actually resolving issues.
I think Blair's strength is that he can actually understand and translate what Bush says. Their synergy is a perfect example or the total being stronger than the sum of it's parts.
Go big Red Go
2006-11-29 05:03:31 · answer #2 · answered by 43 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because they speak a different language lol
Naw Bush would win, Ahmasjldkjalsjlfdjklskj is just a nut job who has an insationable hate for America. At least Bush doesn't hate Iran or Islaml, just those crazy enough to want to take innocent lives
2006-11-29 04:05:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If there was a Translater - Ahmadinejad Only because G.W. Bush Is such a bad public speaker.
2006-11-29 04:07:04 · answer #4 · answered by Kristi K 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ok if Bush spoke to him Ahmadinejad would win, Bush is not a good public speaker. Oh man can you imagine him talking about a pig with him, like he did in Germany?
2006-11-29 04:05:47 · answer #5 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The camel jockey wins hands down. Jorge Arbusto is just another half-wit that could not win a debate against a turnip.
I am the Fringe and debates are for scholars not flim flammers.
2006-11-29 04:15:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
As an American, i might want to really oppose this kind of debate. The President isn't smart sufficient to win. i have heard Ahmadinejad clarify himself and, inspite of the actuality that likely mendacity, he change into eloquent and looked honest. it would want to be yet another embarrassing setback for the U.S. on the international level.
2016-10-07 23:11:38 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hugo Chavez
2006-11-29 04:09:10 · answer #8 · answered by IElop 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In terms of the truth, George Bush would win.
In terms of fiery rhetoric, Ahmadinejad would win.
Bush may not be the best public speaker, but he's understated and honest.
2006-11-29 04:05:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Nor should he.
Bush is a real president.
No real president would ever debate a Nut Case.
(Well maybe Clinton and Carter could surrender to Ahmadinejad.)
Many Democrats would root for Ahmadinejad, because they think he looks sexy.
2006-11-29 04:09:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋