I think alot of ladies say that they would love a man secure enough to let his wife's career take the lead but it seems that many of these relationships fall apart. From my expierence it is that the wife stops respecting the husband. When he protests feeling emasculated he is being sensitive and insecure but if he bears it in silence he is seen as passive. Do you guys think that this is why some men try to not let thier wives careers supass thier own? It seems as if the husband is now in "competition" with his professional wife for her respect. Is this right? Is this happening? is it normal?
2006-11-29
04:02:26
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Magnus01
3
in
Family & Relationships
➔ Marriage & Divorce
Why should women have the option to decide not to be a *significant* provider in the relationship?
Most men have a Taliban style demand that they WILL provide or spend the rest of thier lives single and disgraced.
Is it equitable to give women a choice when men often have no choice or his level is work is determined by what his wife is willing to do. If she decides that she no longer wants to work and he can't support her he is a loser. If she wants to take 3 years off to write a book and he needs her income to support the household he is weak. What would be fair. Should society force ALL wives to provide for thier families like men. Society already forces men to do it so it's not that big of a stretch? What are your thoughts?
2006-11-29
08:26:46 ·
update #1