English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

to prevent terrorists from destroying cities. Agree or disagree?

2006-11-29 03:16:02 · 6 answers · asked by ? 5 in Politics & Government Politics

-----
http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Gingrich+raises+alarm+at+event+honoring+those+who+stand+up+for+freedom+of+speech&articleId=d3f4ee4e-1e90-475a-b1b0-bbcd5baedd78

2006-11-29 03:16:23 · update #1

6 answers

in news stories of columbine type massacres they have pointed out how the people were said to have communicated over the Internet. I hardly see how it would be possible but if the Bushies want to further restrict free speech like in the phone taps they'll figure out a way to do it.

I can see how you might monitor suspicious subjects but with the mass number of communications over the net don't see how you could ever obtain any useful info. I can email my uncle that lives across town through a server in Asia, ya know what I mean.

2006-11-29 03:23:13 · answer #1 · answered by Grev 4 · 1 0

Obama's speech replaced into wonderful and a minimum of Gingrich replaced into guy sufficient to adhere up for something that replaced into accomplished for the excellent motives despite if the different guy is from the different side of the aisle. numerous politicians will argue and hangle over something only because of the fact the different political occasion is affiliated with it. If the President went and worked on a house to motivate human beings to help Habitat for Humanity. i'm particular many conservatives could say that he replaced into dropping time and inspiring human beings to have their properties surpassed to them on a silver plattter and given to them by using the goverment. If he examine "Cat interior the Hat" to them that they had accuse him of analyzing liberal propoganda to the youngsters. it is ridiculous what human beings will accuse only because of the fact the guy is from the different political occasion. that's time that politicians advance up and start up doing what's suited for the U. S. fairly of hectic approximately winning campaign money for the subsequent election or smearing the opponent so that they are able to learn extra votes.

2016-10-13 08:42:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What does free speech restrictions on the internent have anything to do with terrorists?

I do agree that free speech( using the words f**** or a**h**** etc,) should be restricted, especially in YAhoo Answers.

2006-11-29 03:18:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Internet is full of Terrorist Hackers and Propaganda Experts.
Gingrich says that perhaps Terrorists should not have the same freedom of speech as the rest of us.
The Democrats will be up in arms about him saying this.
When more of us die, we will care less about Freedom For Terrorists.

2006-11-29 03:23:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I don't believe that our freedoms make us weak.

In fact, I would suggest it is precisely the openness and freedom of our nation that has served as the underpinning of our success, and to suggest that we should toss aside those freedoms is not only fundamentally wrong, but foolish.

2006-11-29 03:18:57 · answer #5 · answered by Steve 6 · 0 0

Does US own the internet?....lol.

Goodluck with that one Newt!

2006-11-29 03:27:07 · answer #6 · answered by kissmybum 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers