I'm not talking about a tiny butterfly on the small of her back, I'm wondering about women who are substantially tattooed. Women with large or highly visable tattoos. Is it hot or not?
(please include your age with your answer)
2006-11-29 02:53:41 · 35 answers · asked by Uncommon Sense 2 in Beauty & Style ➔ Other - Beauty & Style
age 30 and that depends on the woman and the tattoo's she has. i see some that look awesome and some that don't of all ages. what do you think and whats your age and why are you asking ??? just messing w/ you.
2006-11-29 02:56:04 · answer #1 · answered by Love United 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Female ... 29 .... I currently have one tat on the back of my shoulder, and have 3 more planned .. ankle, small of the back, and hip.
My personal opinion is that, when gone overboard, they no longer look feminine, and I can't stand the way it looks. But that's not necessarily a gender issue either, since I also don't like tattoo's being overdone on a man. The ones who sleeve their arms or attempt to cover every square inch of skin? Yeah .. those.
To me, a tattoo should be an embellishment on your appearance, emphasis, decoration .. it shouldn't be the whole.
2006-11-29 02:57:34 · answer #2 · answered by Jaded 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Small tattoos look nice, I would love to have one. The really large tattoos don't look nice on women at all. I prefer not to give my age
2006-11-29 02:56:18 · answer #3 · answered by Urchin 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am 25 and have 6 tats. Some fairly large but when women get them I think they should be able to be able to be covered up by clothes. I think it a HUGE turn off when I see a woman walking aroud with a full sleeve on her arm or tats all on her body. It just looks trashy. There is nothing wrong with them just make sure you can cover them.
2006-11-29 03:04:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think there is anything wrong w/ big visable tattoo's. If you like them then who cares wheather other people do. you get tattoo's for you not anyone else. Age 23
2006-11-29 03:30:07 · answer #5 · answered by medleyc1 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm 60, got my first tattoo about a year ago (not visible). My 32 yr old daughter has about a dozen tats, many visible. It's a preference. She's hasn't had any negative feedback from guys about them. As you get older, you'll learn when you "see" someone, it will be for who they are, not what they look like! So I say, yeah, hot to some, not to others! :)
2006-11-29 03:05:11 · answer #6 · answered by Tweet 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
My Fiance has a lot of tattoo's, i think it is very pretty but i have a lot of tattoos too :) so yes it is very hot to me
25 years old
2006-11-29 02:56:30 · answer #7 · answered by Jesus Built My Hotrod 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only sexy place for large tattoo on woman is on the muscles of haunches (19).
2006-11-29 04:15:25 · answer #8 · answered by Karmen M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
22-years old, and this girl that I know has both of her sleeves done, and 80% of her back. And, about 40 some odd other tattoo's that she only told but not showed... So, it's nothing to bug me.
2006-11-29 02:56:05 · answer #9 · answered by Cold Fart 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
small tattoos are cool. i want to get one myself. BUT when people look at a girl and man from behind and cant tell which is the guy and which is the girl then thats a problem! So yea i think that when a woman is heavily tattooed its gross, ugly even.
~17yrs old
2006-11-29 03:03:45 · answer #10 · answered by KIMMY 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋