English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-29 01:30:17 · 6 answers · asked by liz s 2 in Politics & Government Politics

oops i mean role

2006-11-29 01:34:41 · update #1

6 answers

In the Communist Manifesto, he (with Friederich Engels) writes:

"The history of all hitherto existing societies is the history
of class struggles."

So, in answer - the role of class struggle in history is history itself. All of history is that of class struggles.

Says Marx.

2006-11-29 01:41:01 · answer #1 · answered by Chris H 2 · 1 0

One could desire to decide Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels via what they wrote, and not via any invalid comparisons to the top of the Soviet Union in 1991 or any puppy theories relating to the character of guy. Karl replace right into a scholar of Philosophy and an avid author - merely how a lot of those whose damaging solutions (fuelled via 50 years of anti-communist propaganda) that have been given right here have study Hegel or have exceeded the token 2-to-4 sentence decrease they habitually hire? i come across no longer something too out of the traditional with the assertion "The background of all exisitng socities..." If immediately the wealth and organic components of our international are nonetheless being controlled via a small group who benefit the main make the main of it, mutually as maximum folk of people conflict daily and receive the least advantages, could you assert that there is now no longer a conflict between the two training? Now, that could desire to be an incorrect!

2016-12-29 15:58:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

While it is easy to quote Karl Marx on in his political theory on class struggle that he was attempting to achieve, was for the implementation of guidelines for fair redistribution of wealth for the masses and classes.
Marx accepted not everyone could be compensated in the same way or same amount.
His objective was not for struggle simply for the sake of struggle.
The social system he proposed was a very fair system that many countries have adopted without conceding it is Marxist philosophy, such as Sweden, Norway, UK those being very successful countries with a reasonabley wealthy middle class.

2006-11-29 02:30:43 · answer #3 · answered by ian d 3 · 0 0

There is no rule because it is possible to continually slip in and out of a class structure according to education, wealth age and occupation. Education and wealth are the great dividers in the class system.

2006-11-29 01:46:06 · answer #4 · answered by Social Science Lady 7 · 0 1

To bring about the dictatorship of the proletariat. According to Rosa Luxembourg, a famous left wing thinker, it really meant dictatorship over the proletariat

2006-11-29 18:34:51 · answer #5 · answered by mick t 5 · 0 1

Whats a rle?

2006-11-29 01:32:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers