I hope not, i think he is a great talent and i would love him to stay at the club - but somehow i think the lure of 10mill plus offer City will let him go where he can be ruined by Chelsea.
It almost feels like that is all city have become a feeder club for other teams now :(
2006-11-29 01:14:41 · 18 answers · asked by I8myjob 3 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
I can't see him going to Man Ure, by all accounts hes a Leeds Fan!! I do expect him to be snapped up tho, my guess it will be Chelsea / possibly Newcastle where he will be offered 10 times his City wage and a clause written his contract to say he has to play a set number of games
2006-11-29 04:24:58 · update #1
Backup to Steven Finnan - you gotta be kidding!! Thats hillhairyarse
2006-11-30 02:45:39 · update #2
I think it'd be better for him to stay at City, at least until the end of the season. But if someone like Chelsea came in with a big enough offer I can't see them rejecting it - aren't you lot still in debt?
To whoever said Arsenal are good at developing young players: yes they've 'developed'/nicked a few very good players but their record with English players is awful. Look at Pennant, Wright, Upson, Jeffers...
2006-11-29 04:16:40 · answer #1 · answered by fubar18ad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He won't circulate away the country, he's basically too youthful and he mentioned he has alto to realize interior the EPL. i do no longer think of Arsenal will make a bid for him as they have an rather fragile team and an rather sturdy returned 4 already and Micah Richards isn't of the enjoying sort of the Arsenal squad. i individually experience he may be a large asset to Chelsea to alleviate their precise-returned issues yet i'm no longer too particular. If no longer bids from Aston Villa, Middlesborough, Portsmouth, Blackburn and Newcastle. i might fairly desire to work out him circulate to West Ham, in mild of their harm disaster, yet that doesn't fairly impact their defence.
2016-12-10 18:19:26 · answer #2 · answered by amass 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hopefully richards is smart enough to see what's happened to wright-phillips and reject a move to chelsea. similarly, he shouldn't go to liverpool either, where the prospects for the future don't look too good (liverpool look astoundingly average). i think it's important that he moves on now and plays weekly with world-class players. arsenal or man united would be the best options, and as much as i'd love to see him in a united shirt, i can't see it happening (man c/man u). i don't think united would bid for him anyway, our priority is a defensive or strong central midfielder or a striker. and i don't think arsenal will bid for him either, their finances are limited and wenger has said he'll ignore the january transfer window. as for chelsea making a bid, i think it's all tabloid rumours. he'll stay until the summer. then move to a better club than manchester sh.itty :)
2006-11-29 04:03:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liverpool will try to get him arsenal wont do anything for him all they do is send them on loan to crappy teams. Liverpool will be looking for a great player to back up steve finnan and micah richards is the one
2006-11-30 02:42:26 · answer #4 · answered by borgking7 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont think he will go in january but in the summer hopefully man utd will show an interest he looks like an ideal long term replacement for gary neville. micah richards would hopefully be interested in a move to his arch rivals but if he has ambition lets face it hes got more chance of winning things at utd than city
2006-11-29 03:55:06 · answer #5 · answered by BOOBAH 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i dont think he will be sold in jauary but a big club will have him, united hopefully as a replacment for neville, but if he went to arsenal he would also grow in reputation, he needs a big time club if hes going to be better. city have a great player in him...well done pierce!
2006-11-29 02:15:22 · answer #6 · answered by Oli 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm a Chelsea fan and the word down our way is a swap deal in january. micah for sw-p.
2006-11-29 14:38:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if chelski buy him they will want wright-phillips back though but i hope they dont sell him unless its to liverpool where he will get a decent chance to develop cos at arsenal they have 2 right backs already and chelsea will ruin him and city wont sell to man utd
2006-11-29 03:46:11 · answer #8 · answered by modstox11 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately for you he'll be moving on. A sad lack of loyalty in the world of club football.
His emergence is great for me...finally people will be able to pronouce my name!
2006-11-29 01:23:46 · answer #9 · answered by Micah H 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hope man u sign him, i know it would never happen. But he would be a ideal replacement for Gary Neville.
2006-11-29 01:23:06 · answer #10 · answered by richard_beckham2001 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋