English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i was just curious...i heard it actually cost only $80,000. Is that true?

2006-11-28 23:19:21 · 12 answers · asked by Cherry M 1 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

12 answers

NO, for everything it was around $250.000 I've known Tom for 19 years. Really, his Mother went to High School with my Mom (my claim to fame....LOL). You would be surprised at how REAL both of them are. You kinda forget the star junk...they are both wonderful great people!

2006-11-28 23:22:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They rented out the entire hotel, which costed $80,000. I'm not sure about the whole wedding though. The Italian government paid for the entire thing. Like they need any financial help.

2006-11-28 23:22:29 · answer #2 · answered by Low Key 6 · 0 0

even though it fee, it change into too a lot. i imagine human beings in the conventional public eye have a duty to be as beneficiant as they're usually - and spending obscene quantities of money on a three hour journey is the antithesis of beneficiant duty. no longer that i'm a huge fan commonly, yet Brad and Angelina are doing something worth with their funds and their acceptance, and refuse to marry until eventually gay and lesbian human beings can celebrate with an same and equivalent rights. i imagine that is a to blame mind-set to acceptance, no longer dressmaker robes and overseas depending wedding ceremony galas. Sorry, purely my opinion.

2016-10-07 23:01:34 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I believe the total cost was estimated near 3 million. I just checked the e news website, and they estimated 2.5 million, the link is below.

2006-11-28 23:23:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think Tom and Katie's wedding cost around $9,000,000.

2006-11-28 23:43:40 · answer #5 · answered by Louise Smith 7 · 0 0

Why spend that much on a wedding? So many other things they could have spent it on.

2006-11-28 23:23:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm Sure it was enough to feed a third world country! Ridiculous.

2006-11-28 23:44:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I heard 2.4 million

2006-11-28 23:22:45 · answer #8 · answered by irish20 2 · 0 0

More than what I would be willing to spend on mine.

2006-11-28 23:54:46 · answer #9 · answered by Dr Dee 7 · 0 0

To much because it won't last.

2006-11-28 23:27:35 · answer #10 · answered by JusMe 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers