because i would love it and stop them ruining football and the English national team!
Look who they have ruined - Shaun Wright Phillips, Glen Johnson, Wayne Bridge and Joe Cole if he continues not playing 90 minutes each week! I think we should start a campaign to get rid of the Crook!
2006-11-28 21:30:45 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
Oh no never, chelski couldn't sink, the roman empire wasn't built overnight, it was just built on a big stash of greenback, if the oilman went it'll be a bigger exodus than juventus, think who they could afford to pay??? they could always wait till eddie newton finishes his ban and makes a comeback with the blues. hahaha
2006-11-28 21:39:00 · answer #1 · answered by curlyhurlymo 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
3x worse than Leeds? Well, for starters they are 3x better than Leeds, having won the title twice and the Carling Cup.
All this talk about him leaving or selling is pure speculation. Rather than waste time wishing or hoping that something ill befalls Chelsea, it would be better for your clubs, to actually attempt something which could narrow the gap with Chelsea.
I doubt there will be massive debt either if he leaves. The club will just sell the high earners and buy less expensive ones. Moreover as someone pointed out, it's his club, not a shareholders one. Any loss would be suffered by him.
A more dire situation is at Old Trafford, where the Glazers had to borrow and put the club into massive debt. A debt which is owed to banks, unlike Chelsea, where the money came from the owner himself.
If the Glazers face some serious financial problem, the knockdown effect could leave United with a massive body blow or near paralysis.
2006-11-29 06:29:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Get a life you tool. Roman's not going anywhere. He's just bought a huge gaff in surrey & has invested more cash in the club. Anyways, Abramo didn't change the club overnight - he just accelerated the revolution. they're not ruining football. I mean do you actually watch it? Johnson's on loan to get more experience, Bridge has a new contract - his choice and Coley still isn't 100% fit.
And to "Giggs is 007" - do you think you can actually ignore a question for once that involves having a go at chelsea? Every question that come up against Chelsea you're there! Grow up & get a life!
2006-11-29 14:50:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
One thing is a fact...over the last two years chelsea have declared world record breaking debt for a football club. When abramovitch leaves (probably to the US to buy a basketball team) chelsea will be in severe financial trouble. Unlike other clubs, Man U, Arsenal or Liverpool for example, all their finances depend on one man, their popularity outside of the uk is minimal unlike the other big three. I think even spurs have a bigger following across the world. Also, Im sure, if a straw poll was to be taken of the football hierachy across europe you would find that chelsea are generally despised and thats not only down to the brand of football they play, long ball percentage game, but also the way they do business...look at the recent events with leeds and arsenal....QED
2006-11-28 21:43:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think a more relevant question is what will happen to Chelsea if the wage structure is changed nationally or internationally by capping salaries.
On page 62 of the Metro newspaper (Wednesday 29th November 2006) top left column theres an article about limiting the wages a club can pay. Chelsea would be decimated by this more than any other club!
2006-11-28 22:03:49 · answer #5 · answered by Bror Jace 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
he'll leave within 5-10 years, maybe sooner if they win the champions league, which is all he really wants to do now. they'd have to sell all their best players, i doubt it would be as catastrophic as the leeds debacle but they'd go back to the same level of quality as they were pre-abramovich
mourinho won't stay another two seasons either, it's just not his style
2006-11-29 03:51:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would be hilarious as everyone hates chelsea, however you are missing the point, he cant just leave, he owns the club which means he would either have to sell it (nobody would buy it though) or simply right it off and shut it down. He cant cant just leave
2006-11-28 23:52:20 · answer #7 · answered by Jamie 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good point!
Should also show a point to those young emerging talents not to join the Chelsea bandwagon..
SWP would def have made it to the England World Cup squad if not for money rich Chelski.
Hmm.. i wonder how Obi Mikel likes reserve games??
Haha..
2006-11-28 21:40:26 · answer #8 · answered by skay_16 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
proper (of all time): Austin v. McMahon, because it thoroughly revolutionzed the WWE. Worst: John Cena v. Shawn Michaels. 2 faces in a competition in many situations would not exercising consultation o.k.. Funniest: unique DX v. us of a of Domination.
2016-11-27 20:44:48 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It could happen. He might get done for being part (or the head) of the Russian Mafia, he might get done for not paying his taxs (but I imagine he has bribed someone at somestage) also if Chelsea stop winning titles every year he might get fed up and leave.
Just another quick though, he might go after they win the champions league, cause he said "he wanted to win one" I wonder if he really means just one. lol
2006-11-28 21:39:35 · answer #10 · answered by Michelino 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋