police in nyc shoot 50 bullets into unarmed mans car.?

Question

Kiliing him right before he is to be married. nyc mayor says killings too extreme by cops

discuss?

Answer 1

The anwsers to this question are both predictable and a joke!!

Last time I checked it didn't take 50 bullets to stop a moving car.
Besides the most obvious thing that all the "Pro cop" anwsers are completing ignoring is that this guy had no drugs in his possession and no weapon on his person...These cops were all in plain clothes and made no attempt to identify themselves to the guy driving...If a bunch of guys who I had no idea of who they were tried stopping me I may act in a similiar fashion (Probably not...But who knows!!)

No the one guy anwsered this right...This guy was shot 50 times and killed because he was black and overzealous cops who'd never been in a situtation like that (as stated right from the NYPD) overreacted...It's a joke!! And the punch line is they'll all get away with it.... I hope N.Y. has an L.A. type riot on it's horizon!!

Answer 2

The mayor was right. This is a tragedy. None of us knows what went through the mens minds in the car prior to this happening. None of us know what led up to the first shot being fired by the police.

I think it would be in the best interest of everyone if we all just stayed calm until a proper investigation can take place.

The officers were wrong and there is at least one of the officers that should never have had a gun. Was the officer racist or trigger happy or was he just overwhelmed with being confronted with a situation that he did not know how to handle? There should have been safe guards in place that would have foreseen that something like this may happen. Obviously the officer that fired in access of 30 shots has issues and it cost an innocent man his life.

Answer 3

The mayor replaced into good. this may well be a tragedy. None individuals is conscious what went in the time of the mens minds interior the motor vehicle only before this taking place. None individuals understand what led as much as the 1st shot being fired by using the police. i think of it may be interior the terrific activity of quite everyone if all of us only stayed calm until a appropriate learn can take place. The officers have been incorrect and there's a minimum of between the officers that would desire to in no way have had a gun. replaced into the officer racist or set off satisfied or replaced into he only crushed with being confronted with a project that he did no longer understand the thank you to deal with? There would desire to have been risk-free guards in place that could have foreseen that something like this would take place. of course the officer that fired in get right of entry to of 30 photographs has themes and it value an harmless guy his existence.

Answer 4

I feel that they were wrong and took too extreme of measures. To me, they should have asked them to step out of the car and be searched. With nothing on them they would have seen that these men had just been out for the guy's bachelor party. They definitely did not conduct a very thorough investigation.

Answer 5

All I know is the next time I'm in NYC, I won't be turning right on red, unless there is a sign allowing it.

Answer 6

Freedom as" We Say "we have is all a Fallacy.When they can take them and your life in a blink of your eye.Welcome to the New Nazi America!

Answer 7

He was guilty of the well-known offense of "driving while Black".

But as the deceased cannot be prosecuted, and suing them is difficult or impossible (this is why Ken Lay and his heirs lucked out by his dying before his appeal was heard), his estate and thus his nonmarital children (but probably not his betrothed) will collect many millions of dollars from the New York taxpayers.

As for the unsupported statement (it was an attempt at cover-up by the cops who did the shooting -- who cannot be interviewed by the police or prosecutors lest they inadvertently be granted immunity) that the driver "deliberately" rammed the police: most of that allegation has evaporated. Apparently the undercover police were wearing black and one was lightly brushed by the car. Once one cop started shooting, others joined in, shooting in all directions at once, including into nearby apartments and at some uniformed Transit Authority police who were hit by flying glass.

What the car did once the shooting started is irrelevant. Frightened -- or dead -- people are not fully responsible for their actions. Unless they are trained policemen, quite legally and legitimately held to a higher standard. Which is why reckless shooting of people known to be peaceable and pacifist is so outrageous: Amadou Diallo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amadou_Diallo , Jean-Charles de Menezes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Charles_de_Menezes

How quick we all are to blame the victim, rather than inadequate training, for such outrages.

Bear in mind that someone who attacks or interferes with an undercover policeman in New York -- even one who has not identified himself as such -- is guilty of a crime. The police have considerable protection; one should have no trouble holding them to a higher standard.

Answer 8

Man in car tried to run over officers. Was leaving a club known for drugs and prostitution with one of the "dancers" from the club - gee what a "pure" thing to do on the night before one's wedding. Ignored orders from police to stop, instead drove car right at officers, hit them & their vehicle, backed up, did it again, then ran into a SWAT vehicle.
NYC Mayor wants to stay in office - denounces shooting.
Anything else?

Answer 9

another reminder that racism is alive and thriving in this "land of equal opportunity."

This is a travesty and we should all be outraged. These incidences occur way too frequently for my liking.

Answer 10

Absolute paranoia..cops who shouldn't be cops....racism...murder in cold blood....It will be interesting to see
if the new york district attorney will seek the death penalty for this crime!