2006-11-28 19:52:29 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Beauty & Style ➔ Fashion & Accessories
Im not a short boxer so I cant help you
2006-11-28 20:02:17 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You're getting two leg holes...so there's a pair! LOL! Boxers have two leg holes to put your two legs through. They're just connected together so they stay on you. Socks don't need to be connected together because they already stay on just fine. That's my logic anyway.
2006-11-28 19:58:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
because its a plural, boxer shorts. there not boxer short. so one sock is 'a sock' but two socks are a 'pair of socks'.
2006-11-28 22:50:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably because boxer shorts are expensive and more quality than just socks
2006-11-28 19:55:56 · answer #4 · answered by bigpercy 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I see what you mean - it is daft! We say a pair of trousers too, don't we? Maybe the Trades Descriptions Act covers this - any lawyers out there?
2006-11-28 20:12:28 · answer #5 · answered by mad 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And why is a pair of trousers a single object? One of life's little mysteries.
2006-11-28 20:12:10 · answer #6 · answered by Dramafreak 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't care about how many socks or shorts - what I care about is that I just got 2 points!!!! You jus lost 5 points!! you're on a roll - ask away!!
2006-11-28 20:23:01 · answer #7 · answered by Bootilicious 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
the boxer has got to holes for your legs how is that!!
2006-11-28 20:18:24 · answer #8 · answered by creoleman 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because you have got two legs BUT only one body obvious really
2006-11-28 19:55:34 · answer #9 · answered by Bella 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Tesco does packs of two.
2006-11-30 22:10:26 · answer #10 · answered by Roxy. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋