No one seems to know about the fact that the Japanese nuclear program was delayed by 90 days due to a B-29 raid in 1945.
They moved the whole program to the gargantuan facility at Hung nam, North Korea (then a Japanese colony), away from our bombers. August 12, 1945 a remote controlled ship was detonated successfully. It was about 20% more powerful than ours but the size of a tractor trailer. Plan was to sub sail it into San Fransisco Bay and explode it in a one-way mission. Think of what that would have done! Three days after Hiroshima they hit US with a nuke? Ever wonder why they did not surrender immediately after Hiroshima? The scientists were being asked "how soon to build another bomb?". As the answer came, "three months, your highness," the second bomb fell. Most interesting of all is the fact that the Russians delared war mainly to grab the Hungnam facility and the scientists. They destroyed their instruments and dumped their US-made cyclotron in the ocean. Next in the club!
2006-11-28 19:23:56 · 8 answers · asked by Don S 2 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Motorcycles
This may really be true! There are reports that the Japanese did detonate a small atomic device Aug. 12 on an island off Hungnam three days before they surrendered. And just like he is saying if it wasn't for the B-29 raid they would have had a bomb three months earlier... If they would have succeeded we would all probably be speaking in Japanese right now and still be at work...
2006-11-28 21:06:21 · answer #1 · answered by barfoeng 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
nicely as an American i will say, nope not scared the North Korea has examined a nuclear bomb. Now I do concern for countries like Japan and South Korea who're nicely in decision of a North Korean missile strike. If North Korea does proceed its progression of nuclear palms i imagine you'll see a tactical strike adversarial to their centers with UN approval. North Korea's greatest "allies" Russia and China even understand that North Korea is treading in deep water and not using a existence perserver. finally they are going to drown themselves in the experience that they shop up this %.. What many people fail to understand is the the Korean warfare isn't over. No peace contract became ever signed. absolutely a non-aggression treaty which absolutely end the scuffling with yet not the warfare itself. A North Korean strike on South Korea ought to violate this contract and the UN ought to ought to deliver in troops as they were the governing body who licensed using stress contained in the first position.
2016-11-27 20:41:44 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Japanese never built a nuke. They had plans too, which is how Russia built theirs because they found the plans. Thats how the cold war started. And Japan surrendered after the U.S. threatened them with another bomb.
2006-11-28 21:11:28 · answer #3 · answered by diamond_joe1979 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd love to see your source for this. And don't think for a minute the Japanese wouldn't have used it if they had a delivery system.
2006-11-28 19:48:16 · answer #4 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No one seems to know that the Japanese never built a nuclear weapon.
2006-11-28 19:39:05 · answer #5 · answered by bestonnet_00 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are in motorcycles. The hysterical rumor and conspiracy dept. is two doors down.
2006-11-29 09:37:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
And this fact has never been reported for what reason?
2006-11-30 09:41:11 · answer #7 · answered by preacher55 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Where did you get your information from? Any links?
2006-11-28 19:39:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋