but in means of psychological term, we tend to confuse with our thinking with our feelings. in order to distinguish from both, the only way is to completely seperate them, and not only seperate them but have different reaction to your life and impression from childhood, this dosent sound like a union at all but more like chaos from order
2006-11-28 18:44:57 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I hope you will not be disappointed from my comment to your question.
I believe that our brains are universal as a hardware, since all may use the same drug for their headache.
Software-wise (impressions and experiences, ...) may differ but all may recognize each other sorrows, fears, and happiness.
same psychiatris may heal problem based on whatever the experiences are.
2006-11-28 19:01:25 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The soame universr can contain the thinking and feelings. In the same manner color is mute to the blind thoughts and feeling are mute to each other yet the existence on one does not preclude the simultaneous existence of the other and therefore the union of the universe can be explained.
2006-11-29 02:51:43 · answer #2 · answered by zoomzoom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not a union at all. Using such terms as; adopted children of God,children of God,son of God,union with God are but terms that the ego can relate to as "it",the sense of self separate from God, is in the process of being burned away as one enters into The allness of God. "God dwells within you as you". You see it backward,it is order from chaos. also I have been in two states of chaos, watching both as if in slo-motion,& i can tell you there is total control of all events in life. Your own heart will "explain" if you will only learn to Listen to it,for it is ultra gentle & patient.
2006-11-29 07:26:53 · answer #3 · answered by Weldon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if one considers what we call matter as being inanimate, then the question you have described arises..otherwise union is but one thing, this being the product of desire which tends to group together that which is in likeness and complimentarity..
2006-11-29 02:54:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, it is purely experiential !
That is why Socrates had said something like this "Those who know do not speak, and those who speak , do not know" !
2006-11-29 07:25:13 · answer #5 · answered by Spiritualseeker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋