could care less if a poacher kills a mother gorilla and snatches its helpless innocent baby and its off to the black market......that is way more sad than anything
Why are pro lifers so cold toward other species........that never hurt anyone the way humans have
humans are the most destructive creatures on this esrth
2006-11-28 17:48:34 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
We don't even need to give examples of animals but of the freaking millions of street children that are raped, beaten and on drugs everyday. I'd like to see these extremists go all around the world and shelter every single one of them. If they can't, they ought to shut up.
2006-11-28 17:56:07 · answer #1 · answered by Craiova 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Prolifers are cold toward their own species. They want all pregnancies to result in birth but no aid is given to the mother and child to susvive in this world. Each Prolifer should agree to adopt an abused child or a special needs child. They spend millions on their campaigns to save what the delusion of the perfect white picket fence family, when so many of these births end up happening to women in poverty who cannot care for kids. Humans are the most destructive creatures on earth! Best of luck to you!!
2006-11-29 01:57:49 · answer #2 · answered by whrldpz 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm prolife although I'm not an extremist. You will never see me protesting or anything along those lines. I believe what I believe for my own reasons-the same others have theirs.
Aside from that, me being prolife, in NO WAY am I cold towards other species. I do care. Yet, I do agree that humansare the most destructive creatures on earth.
2006-11-29 03:12:30 · answer #3 · answered by Jessica 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you are missing the point of Pro-lifers.
I am not a prolifer, much less an extremist prolifer, but I think their platform is to not kill HUMAN BEINGS, usually based on the word of God. Gorillas aren't human...that's not to say that prolifers don't care about gorillas either.
Also, are you implying that animals are as valuable as human babies? Because that's just weird.
And, no, not all prolifers should have to adopt a child who is unwanted by their birth parents. It's not a prolifers responsibility. There are plenty of families who are desperate for to adopt children so much so that they go to other countries to do it. It's the responsibility of the parents of the unborn child..Responsibility is the key word. There are so many options today that can help prevent an un-wanted pregnancy or child (birth-control, adoption, abstinence), and I think that's a part of the prolifer's stance.
2006-11-29 02:34:19 · answer #4 · answered by leave me alone 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think sweeping generalizations can be the most destructive thing on earth. While I am pro-choice myself, I don't believe there is any connection between the pro-life movement and animal poaching. Is there some particular event you are basing your question on?
2006-11-30 23:48:00 · answer #5 · answered by Uncommon Sense 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No carp(yes carp) humans are the most destructive thing on this earth. And who says all pro-life supporters don't love animals? You have no justification on saying that. Also its a gorilla, I enjoy our close relatives but if it matters choosing a child and a gorilla. I am sorry but the child is going to win my vote.
2006-11-29 01:52:57 · answer #6 · answered by Cindy 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋