What might a "truly democratic" society look like?

Answer 1

A truly democratic society would be one where all the people can vote on every single law, issue, ordinance, regulation, etc. In essence, it would be a mess.

99% of the people would quickly get sick of it and stop voting on 99% of the stuff because they cannot possibly keep up with it all. The remaining 1% would control all, as they are the ones who are probably writing the laws and regulations that eventually get voted on by the few who vote.

No, a democratic republic is the way to go. It's better that we elect representatives to handle the day to day stuff, but it would be nice to be able to vote on bigger stuff in national referendums. It'd be nice to outlaw congressional abuses, wasteful spending, etc by national referendum.

Answer 2

I would say that a society with people eligible to vote actually vote, accepts the outcome of the vote, and follow the rules (previously voted in) to change the outcome in the next round. Doing so consistently decades after decades would approach one being "truly democratic".
There is not a country in the world that comes close.

Answer 3

to most of the powers that be, Communism. A government truly of the people for the people and by the people would more than likely result in a country where the people assume control of the gross national product. Remember Communism is an economic philosophy not a political one. Marx intended Communism for a democratic Germany.

Answer 4

If it replaced right into a organic Capitalist Society, basically people who use the centers might pay for them, yet interior america of a, because it replaced into based, the form is obvious how those centers would be paid, taxes. the place the objections come is whilst Capitalism will become the villain and freeloaders the victims. remember the early American contract, whilst some settlers stated they did not prefer to artwork for the contract, they have been advised they did not could yet they does not share interior the advantages the two--that blanketed nutrition, water, safeguard or risk-free practices. that they had a decision, artwork or not, they chosen artwork on account that they needed the advantages the artwork extra. right now we've thank you to many in united states of america who prefer the advantages with out the artwork required. hence the "Socialist/Marxist" references. people who choose for to not artwork, nonetheless get the advantages--that may not a Capitalist Society.

Answer 5

Following modern social science, truly democratic nation would be a place where person must run away from other people before they could exercise their democratic rights.
And following the principles of the engineers of democracy, like Abraham Lincoln it would be a perfect place to live in.
The difference is the source of the law under which the phrase rule of law is subjected.
the more the sources, the more the confusion , the more arnachy.
democracy needs one single source of principle and values. so that they may be one source of law.

Answer 6

total chaos: The passion of the mob would rule and laws would be passed on a cause du jour basis. The founding fathers knew exactly what they were doing when the set up a republican form of government.The basic idea was to protect the people from the people, the people from the government, the government from the people and the minority from the tyranny of the majority .

Answer 7

California.

Answer 8

You would have to look to Switzerland or Cuba to see!
#1 They would not allow any political parties

Answer 9

Try History:
The "golden period" of the Athenians.
Periklis, Themistoklis
It all started there

Answer 10

A survivor episode.