English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

I think that she would make a good president. Better than the lemon that we have now.

2006-11-28 17:39:23 · answer #1 · answered by The professor 4 · 1 4

There is a very good chance she will become our first female President. I think she'd do a great job. I admire her for many reasons, but I need to hear her national platform before I truly commit myself to her campaign. If I like where she stands, I will likely work on her campaign, something I haven't done in years. She's the front-runner within her base right now, by a large margin.

She's a brilliant and formidable woman. I gained a lot of respect for her in the way she handled herself with amazing grace under the pressure of being humiliated in front of the world by Bill. It was the first time I took serious notice of her and her character. She had to be thinking about the Presidency then, and I'm sure was well aware a divorced woman would never sit in the Oval Office. Some think that's too calculating - I think that kind of iron will is admirable in a Commander in Chief. It's funny, I hear all these supposed insults thrown at her like she's too stern, she's too aggressive, she's too calculating. None of which would be said about a male running, no matter how much he was disliked. Those are desirable traits for a male President, why aren't they desirable in a woman President? There's a lot of gender stereotyping going on but my gut tells me she could handle that crap standing on her head if she had to. She reminds me very much of Margaret Thatcher.

2006-11-29 01:49:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

NO!!!! OH, NO!!! No more Billary in the White House -- the woman is PSYCHOTIC and just plain out of touch with REALITY! All you have to do is read her rantings on the Floor of the Senate.

Just like Billy-boy, she will be the Criminal in the White House -- and our country will NEVER be the same -- we will be sold out to every Celebrity and nutcase around the world, and will once again experience a destructive force on OUR defensive capabilities that one saw while her 'husband' was the President of the US.

Do you really want someone that has done more to make women look bad in the White House?

2006-11-29 01:39:03 · answer #3 · answered by sglmom 7 · 3 1

You mean the first shemale as there are deffinite doubts about her actual sex.

Well lets put it this way.

In terms of petty vindictiveness Hillary should have her name by the definition in the dictionary. She holds grudges for ages and then abuses power such as using the FBI to get back at personal enemies. So to me, I cannot understand why her and her husband were not imprisoned for abuse of power when they were caught with the FBI files of personal enemies of theirs. More so why was there even FBI investigations of these people? Isn't that a Gestapo like tactic?

I am tired of liars disguised as leaders. Tired of the lies of Bush of Clinton of Bush's father and all the combined lies of the jokes that inhabit Congress. I am also tired of the corruption. Hillary got caught in several lies. Not as many as her husband who seemed to lie just to exercise his lips. Still her dishonesty is legendary.

Her hypocracy should inspire a monument. Think about it. Here she is the ideal of the femenist movement. Who is she married too? The ideal of what feminists hate. Her husband not only cheated on her with such regularity that it crippled his administration with scandal when he was prez. He also did it so blatently that she could not have long been aware of his infidelity. So why did she stay with him? Is she that weak in charactor or that greedy? Was she using him to gain office? Either case she is not the kind of person I want representing the US. If she's so mousy that she tolerated her husband's infidelity or so unrealistic to believe he'd change or used Bill for power. All cases make for one sick person.

Lets talk about her beliefs. At least this weeks version of them. That's the biggest problem. She clearly has no real idea or she has no real conviction to her ideals. Either case she is not somebody we should have leading a marching band much less prez of the US.

Her thinking when she does make a public stand on something is quite simplistic. People lack decent health care so her idea is to make sure NOBODY has decent health care and to enrich whole loads of politicians. Health care is a complex question. You cannot throw simplistic answers at and expect anything but disaster. A deadly disaster that kills thousands possibly millions.

Lets talk about the effect she'd have on the country. It is already polarized. Very polarized. Not many people attract hate the way Hillary does. She's the ultimate example of the bitter spinster. She exudes hate like most people sweat. If she smiled you'd almost expect to see croc's teeth not a human smile. Her election would juice the polarization of the nation. Put it on steroids and give it a big dose of misery. Not because of her sex but because of her style and what she represents. So I cannot think of anything that could be more divisive to the nation than putting Hitlerly in the White house. Even Jeb Bush would not cause as much rankle with the opposite extreme than Clinton would.

On the humerous side we would get treated to more Bill Clinton whoppers like not believing a BJ was sex. Do you really want people that believe you are SO stupid that you'd swallow something like that? Or worse what if he actually believed that?

It was not the first nor the last whopper from Clinton. Hillary stuck by this joke and is guilty by association. Doesn't matter. The Democraps will elect some rabid liar or the Repugnicans will elect some rabid liar and the country will continue to decline.

2006-11-29 01:46:20 · answer #4 · answered by draciron 7 · 1 2

Hillary will not gain a third term in the White House (Let's face it... She was the real power behind Billy boy). She does not have enough support even from within her own base. My guess is Barak Obama will be the next democratic presidential nominee... Him or Al Gore.

2006-11-29 01:30:18 · answer #5 · answered by Firestorm 6 · 3 1

I personally do believe Hillary Clinton will become president if she officially runs in 2008. My reason for saying this is look at all her support and PR she was and is doing for herself. The second reason is look at who her husband was and carrying the last name of a former president is strong.

2006-11-29 01:34:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

I hate to admit it, but I think she would be a great president. I loved Bill, but Hillary would prolly do a lot of good for our country. I would vote for her.

2006-11-29 01:49:33 · answer #7 · answered by DnBprincess850 5 · 2 2

I think she would make a good president, but lets face it men are not going to support her. So she will not get elected because of the "red neck states".

2006-11-29 01:36:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

i doubt it, she'll never get the votes, the people who don't like her hate her. you need a candidate who isn't hated by non supporters. you need the swing vote

2006-11-29 01:32:56 · answer #9 · answered by cubbies9911 3 · 0 1

well its not that she is a woman but who she is....i dont think that she would win, and it seems that most of us forgot what she said in the past, the goverment can do a better job of raising our babies......

2006-11-29 01:31:13 · answer #10 · answered by glduke2003 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers