2006-11-28 16:28:25 · 3 answers · asked by Vickie F 1 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
It doesn't. He was purely speculating.
Modern developmental psychology is based on empirical observation and (usually) experiments
2006-11-28 16:31:29 · answer #1 · answered by Ejsenstejn 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i really do no longer comprehend a lot metaphysics. i'm purely 5'7", so maximum stuff is "over my head" LOL. yet I have important adventures in Mystical Psychology and Spirituality, and also Psychosomatic drugs. So i ought to say that Jung's Collective subconscious matches and meshes properly with: a million. The Oversoul; 2. The IT of George Groddeck, M.D. 3.The Cosmic participant, as I call it commonly. 4. Abraxas, the god of both good and Evil. (Herman Hesse, Steppenwolf) 5. The Tao of Taoism. 6. The "Soul Pool", oft observed as the "Communion of Saints". 7. Gurdjieff's Absolute, --"maximum tremendous and maximum Holy sunlight Absolute". 8. Eckart Tolle's NOW; 9. Gangaji's actual Self. 10. The Holographic Universe. 11. Jesus' 'Kingdom of Heaven'. The above isn't unique of alternative lifelike thoughts. Scientology isn't a collection of lifelike thoughts; neither is Judaism, Islam or Xianity. No contact upon religions i'm a lot less familiar with. Zoroastrianism isn't my uniqueness. BTW, notwithstanding subconscious it ought to look to US, it really is likely conscious of and in itself. ..Or is it blind, and attempting to be unsleeping and self-conscious through us, the Creatures? !
2016-10-16 10:58:01 · answer #2 · answered by beaudin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vickie, do your own homework.
2006-11-28 16:36:30 · answer #3 · answered by Ade 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋