2006-11-28 15:25:31 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Yea he's awesome. How 'Bout Them COWBOYS!!!
2006-11-28 15:38:16 · answer #1 · answered by christophergt237 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not ready to anoint Romo just yet. Terry Glenn has always been an underrated receiver and despite the drops T.O. is one of the best in the league. The offense also has two very good backs in Marion Barber and Julius Jones, not to mention Jason Whitten who is a very good tight end. He has weapons out the *** and Bill Parcells knows how to win. Sitting Bledsoe was definantely the right move (past his prime).
2006-11-28 16:33:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
cuz he's the face of the Dallas Cowboys now and each physique hates the Cowboys. He dates the Jessica Simpsons and the Carrie Underwoods of the international. On superb of that, the media pushes him on the followers cuz it quite is solid for the league while the Cowboys do properly. it quite is been because of the fact that Troy Aikman because of the fact the Cows had a able QB and the Cows devoted are perhaps slightly rapid to hail him because of the fact the subsequent great. i'm a Cowboys fan and for my section like him. he's a great tale and did no longer in basic terms throw up an egg in the two playoff losses. they had Seattle beat and the Giants have been 2 undesirable offsides calls and a pair Patrick Crayton drops from getting beat so do no longer say Romo's by no potential harm the Giants. You adult males went 0-2 in the process the season in case you will bear in mind and did no longer win the branch. it quite is all media. I mean, what the hell has Adrian Peterson performed? yet he's being hailed because of the fact the subsequent Barry Sanders and greater appropriate than LT! in basic terms time will tell who the greats are.....
2016-12-13 16:27:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Romo is just a good QB.
Bledsoe had the same receivers and we had a 4-4 season.
Romo has a better connection with the receivers.
"How bout' them Cowboys?"
2006-11-29 09:23:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, Romo is playing awesome right now but he doesn't have enough games under his belt to give him a title of an awesome quarterback. Let's see how he does over the long haul but you have to give him credit right now for a superior performance and it certainly doesn't hurt to have good receivers like Glenn and TO.
2006-11-29 03:26:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Romo's an awesome QB. Bledsoe had the same receivers and he sucked.
2006-11-28 15:28:46 · answer #6 · answered by mesquitemachine 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The answer is not in five, six, or sixteen games. Forget his receivers, most NFL receivers are capable. Today he is a meteor, a large one granted, but a shooting star. To be a big star you have to shine for many years! Look at Pittsburgh and NE as examples. One shines on and on, the other ???. Good, most certainly - Great, time will tell.
2006-11-29 03:31:52 · answer #7 · answered by jerry g 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say both. He connects with them well. Of course the diffrence is Romo can move around more. Hes faster and can create more oppertunities. he protects the football better too.
Of course Terry Glenn and T.O are great.
together they kick butt
Go Dallas
2006-11-28 18:07:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably 60 % romo, 40% receivers... by benching Bledsoe (and I am a pats fan, and was always true to bledsoe), the cowboys turned around completely... so i'm leaning toward Romo...
2006-11-29 08:01:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Romo has yet to really prove himself.
Just wait to see the team doing bad and see how he handles it
2006-11-28 19:03:43 · answer #10 · answered by NoTHiNGFaC3L 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
romo played the entire preseason without T.O. and a couple of quarters in preseason without glenn and dallas still went 3-0-1.
2006-11-28 16:50:26 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋