Laveranues Coles is the easy answer if he is playing - Green Bay corners are SUSPECT! Reggie Brown has no one to throw him the ball and Deion Branch will have Champ Bailey coverning him in Denver. If Coles does not go I'd start D. Branch.
2006-11-28 15:25:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Super Jim 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Go with coles.... He's the #1 guy in that offense and the packers aren't exactly sutting people down. Brown's stats are hurting without mcnabb and as the #2 guy again. The seahawks have a lot of options on offense, so branch isn't a lock for a score week in and week out and denver has a pretty strong defense. Good luck!
2006-11-28 15:28:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Zloar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is one key piece of information that you want: what number communities? Say that's 10 communities. the expectancy is that the right 70 gamers will be saved. in case you position this type of fellows contained in the right 70, that's probable perfect to save one (till you note a crew that 's loaded and would might want to drop some better gamers). probable you get a %. previously the established alternatives of your draft (ie. a seventh round %., with the first round of your draft surely being the eighth round), so till you imagine that you'll get a better guy with the %. save actually one of them. i'd wager that (in this 10 or extra crew subject) Coles is probable reliable adequate to be saved. i'd seem at everyone's rosters and project who will be saved and who will be accessible, then evaluate your concepts. keep in mind that different communities might want to pick to have the %., which ability you would no longer immediately have your determination of the large style one unprotected participant. reliable luck!
2016-11-29 22:09:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yah coles is a good choice. deion branch against denver(whose D is not bad) is not so good. and if DM is not qb, reggie brown is getting nothing.
2006-11-28 17:11:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by king1515us 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
go with coles, Brown is to undependable and branch isnt that good
2006-11-29 01:03:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋