2006-11-28 14:18:28 · 11 answers · asked by Robert B 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Sorry, "Peart"
2006-11-28 14:23:43 · update #1
Yo!
Neil Peart is cool, but he is like listening to old Def Leopard on amphetamines.
Personally, I prefer Stuart Copeland; he is innovative and much more intriguing.
Why?
Neil Peart = Soloist.
Stuart Copeland = Accompanist.
2006-11-28 19:02:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neil Peart then Mike Portnoy from Dream Theater.
2006-11-28 14:32:54 · answer #2 · answered by stomp65 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neil pert played on more tedious songs than Copeland, so I'll have to say Neil is the better drummer, while Copeland is a good drummer.
2006-11-28 14:22:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stewart Copeland Better drummer, then Neil Pert but what do I know
2006-11-28 14:20:26 · answer #4 · answered by justmejimw 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No contest- Neil Peart all the way in my opinion.
2006-11-28 14:21:56 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Pert i be attentive to, yet what band(s) does/did Gadd drum with? Pert's reliable, yet i like Keith Moon, late drummer of the Who -E EDIT: Yeah! MJK has a reliable factor: device- nuff mentioned! That and whoever mentioned 'this is like evaluating painters' has a factor; this question is the two 'which do you like extra effectual?' OR 'this is technically extra gifted?', wherein case, i don't be attentive to sufficient approximately drumming to decide. what share drummers does it take to alter a easy bulb? -none; they have machines for that
2016-12-29 15:37:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's tough. Probably Peart.
2006-11-28 14:19:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's Peart, not Pert, and he's the best.
2006-11-28 14:21:24 · answer #8 · answered by I'd Tap That 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Carmen Appice.
2006-11-28 14:20:24 · answer #9 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
bonham
2006-11-28 14:19:35 · answer #10 · answered by big3idiots 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋