2006-11-28 14:06:23 · 19 answers · asked by zzz 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Reba K - Lets all breath together, and let the tensions exit our bodies. Feel the tension, leaving your body, as we all exhale.
2006-11-28 14:18:12 · update #1
LOL, Relax.
2006-11-28 14:25:23 · update #2
Nolan B- Lets do a little history lesson.
The 9 supreme court justices in 2000, were
1 John P. Stevens
2 Antonin Scalia
3 Anthony Kennedy
4 David Souter
5 Clarence Thomas
6 Ruth bader Ginburg
7 Stephen Breyer
8 Sandra Day O'conner
9 William Rehnquist
The election was not stolen. The supreme court at this time was more liberal ,than conservative. The conservatives?
1 Antonin Scalia
2 Clarence Thomas
3 William Rehnquist
The moderates
4 Anthony Kennedy
5 Sandra Day O'conner
The liberals
6 Davis Souter
7 Ruth Bader Ginsburg- A card carrying member of the Unamerican civil liberties union
8 Stephen Breyer
9 John Paul Stevens
Nolen b - The supreme court ruled in favor of Bush, because they followed election law . Get over it, and quit crying about it.
Another thought for you, Why was it the liberal members of the court, who supported imminent domain? I thought liberals were for the poor, and downtrodden? It takes 5 for a majority.
2006-11-28 20:44:12 · update #3
Governor Jeb Bush of Florida!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-11-28 14:12:33 · answer #1 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
...that people like you would stop asking a question like that and get involved in the massive problems that exist TODAY, not 2008, but Today. Your country is on the BRINK OF DISASTER with crazy Bush running around the Middle East trying to fix it RIGHT NOW. He was all big talk and puffed up all these years. Now he's running around like an idiot trying to do damage control.
And all you can think about is 2008. Get with the program!! He's got all of the Iraq experts there meeting with countries trying to wiggle through past horrible decisions by the Neoconservatives.
There's no telling how things will come out but this is a complete crisis.
Try thinking more about what you want to tell this government. They need your guidance. The existence of America is at stake and this is not fun and games.
2006-11-28 22:11:54 · answer #2 · answered by Reba K 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Tom Daschle and Al Gore for the Democrats. Republican: The only ones I have even the slightest amount of respect for are Rudy Guilliani and John McCain.
2006-11-28 22:56:54 · answer #3 · answered by Scrapaholic 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ronald Reagan.
2006-11-28 22:47:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Al Gore. He got screwed 6 years ago by a republican supreme court and I think he is the best candidate. As for the republicans I don't know whoever runs is in trouble because of Bush and the Iraq war.
2006-11-28 22:11:05 · answer #5 · answered by Joe 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Pat Paulsen
2006-11-28 22:09:29 · answer #6 · answered by goodtimesgladly 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
John McCain and Rudy Giuliani
2006-11-28 22:13:54 · answer #7 · answered by Evangelion 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Joe Biden and Sherrod Brown
2006-11-28 22:08:51 · answer #8 · answered by leena 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bill Richardson and Barack Obama. They'd be an amazing combination at getting things done.
2006-11-28 22:11:23 · answer #9 · answered by Gerty 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hillary Clinton and Wesley Clark
2006-11-28 22:08:17 · answer #10 · answered by cwdc 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Hillary Clinton with Bill Clinton as her running mate.
2006-11-28 22:12:19 · answer #11 · answered by wisdomforfools 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋