Should America withdraw from China's six-party talks?

Question

1)Whereas, the nuke threat of North Korea is heightening, and
2)Whereas, China's economic relations with Norht Korea is inhibiting successful negotiations,and
3)Whereas, the U.S. should resume bilateral negotiations with North Korea in an attempt to quell nuclear testing and proliferation, and
4)Whereas, if military action becomes necessary, the U.S. will then disregard bilateral policies and approach with a united force.
5)Therefore, be it resolved, that the United States withdraw from China's Sex-Party talks.

Answer 1

Kind of a mute point when we have been the #1 advocate pushing for 6 party talks for years now...

Answer 2

No. The big problem is whatever is decided, North Korea will break an agreement, accuse the US of some bizarre nonsensical act or act in a typical insane way. It does us no harm to talk to them. So we should continue. Bilateral talks will require so many idiotic conditions from North Korea that they will never get off the ground.

And we REALLY don't want to get into a war with North Korea. That would make Iraq look like a tea party.

Answer 3

China is in a position to force N Korea to give up its nukes.
We should pressure China by "leaking" that we will provide nukes to our Asian allies as a response to a nuclear N Korea. Somehow, I don't think that China wants to see nukes in the hands of Japan, S Korea & Taiwan.

Answer 4

NO!!!! Japan and South Korea are going be meeting with
China to see if they can get tougher with North Korea.

Answer 5

WE don't need to be there. Let N. Korea's neighbors handle the situation. Besides the sex probably wouldn't be that good.

Answer 6

because of the fact in 2002, the North Korea choose to have the nuclear weapon, and ask for the permission of america. because of the fact america has B-2 bomb service could destroy the corporate.

Answer 7

Sex party talks ? Betcha Bill Clinton would be dying to
be in on it.

Answer 8

Sex-Party talks? NO.