English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This week Bush meets with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki to discuss the deteriorating situation in Iraq. Why are they not meeting in the Green Zone ? Why will Bush assess Iraq, "the forefront" of his war on terror in Amman, Jordan?

2006-11-28 12:12:57 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

11 answers

USA face the reality when called the exestance of USA army in Iraq by OCUPATION not( librate army take authnefication from the national security cauncel or united nation and the Iraq goverment doll ) at this moment situation will be better

2006-11-29 04:17:30 · answer #1 · answered by abu 3 · 0 0

Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei blamed the United States for the chaos in Iraq, saying the answer to the violence is the withdrawal of foreign forces.

But following Khamenei's comments, the U.N. Security Council voted unanimously to extend for one year the mandate of the 160,000-strong multinational force in Iraq.

Guess the UN is wrong too!

2006-11-28 12:26:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

everyday Petreaus, the superb US everyday in Iraq, gave a stark message to Washington officers on the Pentagon right this moment. Petraeus suggested, fact under: "My experience is that there could be a upward push or resumption in sectarian violence have been the presence of our forces and Iraqi forces have been to be decreased. it may get lots, lots worse than it replaced into." everyday Petreaus pointed to 2 nerve-racking advancements- the greater advantageous profile of Al Qaeda in Iraq and extra and extra evidence acquired by making use of US forces that Iran is attempting to destabilize the region by making use of investment rebellion communities. He additionally stated that ninety % of the undesirable assaults on the sects are complete by making use of Al Qaeda. So i might pass with the chief of the MNFI over some former chief and a few others unnamed.... from briefing: "And the Dura section specifically struck me because of the fact there replaced into no longer a unmarried keep open in any respect; and there now are -- i think of it quite is over 2 hundred and actually mountain climbing daily. the rationalization is with the help of the fact Iraqi and coalition squaddies hardened that industry, placed Iraqi and U.S. wrestle outposts proper in the middle of the industry, and then on its outer edge. and in fact, I walked by way of that section with a CNN reporter, in fact, some weeks in the past, and it has persisted to enhance by way of the years down there even with assaults. So there's a level of resilience there besides. yet that's what we are seeing. And returned, too quickly, i think of, to call that a fashion, too quickly to assert that what we've performed in in basic terms the 1st couple of months has -- with our Iraqi companions, returned, enabled them to stitch at the same time the textile of society that replaced into so torn. "

2016-12-13 16:21:57 · answer #3 · answered by shearin 4 · 0 0

The US Government admit it made a mistake, not in our lifetime. I'm sure it turned out just like the Bush administration knew it would. It made billionaires out of a few close friends and killed a lot of people. So what else is new????? That's what war is all about.

2006-11-28 12:19:36 · answer #4 · answered by Billy M 4 · 1 2

Bush will not, but if we elect a Democratic President, he/she will admit it, then do something about it.

2006-11-28 12:29:27 · answer #5 · answered by Ian C 2 · 1 1

No, YOU'RE lost; when are you going to admit it and face reality?

2006-11-29 12:14:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Guess he called you first huh? Maybe in your reality it's lost. Not mine and not our men & women over there. Thank goodness....

2006-11-28 12:27:55 · answer #7 · answered by Rich B 5 · 1 1

This is verging on a reportable abuse. What is the point of this question?

2006-11-28 12:52:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Which question do you want an answer to? Ob-vi-ous-ly it is too dan-ger-ous to go to the-e green-zone. Do I need to talk slower?

2006-11-28 12:33:21 · answer #9 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 0 2

our president will never admmit notin anyways it's not like is nam yet is it

2006-11-28 12:21:22 · answer #10 · answered by c_run123 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers