English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There has been a rumor that The Undertaker will challenge Batista for the World Heavyweight Title at Wrestlemania 23 and it looks like those idiots at the WWE might choose to have Batista win, but The Undertaker has been adament about if he has to lose to Batista then he would rather not challenge for the title because he rather lose to someone like Benoit at Wrestlemania than Batista who has been very disrespectful to alot of the veterans by trying to act like he is the best person backstage. If you don't know, Mark Calloway (Undertaker) wanted his streak to end by Randy Orton, but Orton declined out of respect for Mark (those two are actually friends in real life). Here is the proof:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1169315/bio
Anyways, I know you Batista fans are all for The Undertaker losing, but I believe that he has meant so much to the WWE and pro wrestling in general that if he doesn't want to do it than he shouldn't have to. Also I believe he should never be beaten at Wreastlemania.

2006-11-28 10:10:04 · 12 answers · asked by Thomas C 4 in Sports Wrestling

So here is the question. "What do you think Mark (The Undertaker) should do?" Personally, I would love to see him face Benoit, it has been a rivalry that I have wanted to see for a long time because they are two of the last few Ring Generals left and you know the match would be classic. Give the World Heavyweight Title shot to someone like Mr. Kennedy or someone else. Mark deserves to have a say in whatever he does, it is as simple as that.

2006-11-28 10:14:01 · update #1

12 answers

i Agree there is no one wrestling today that should beat him the only person that i would possible accept to end his streak is a veteran like Shawn Michaels. I dont believe any of this new wrestlers will even come close to the legacy of the undertaker and to have him lose to Batista some run of the mill powerhouse would be sad way to end his streak and the only thing the Undertaker can say no one else has done because he hasn't been champion that much so let the Undertaker retire on top or let somebody that deserves it beat him like Kane, Michaels, or Mick Foley they used to have a great feud i would love to see a buried alive match between them at wrestlemania 23 they both still have it

2006-11-28 11:47:28 · answer #1 · answered by Sean C 1 · 3 0

Well I didn't read the answers so a lot of this might be covered. I wouldn't mind Taker losing a Mania because I think it would be a good way for him to go out. Many would say he should go out on top but if he wins another Wrestlemania, it would just be something that he has done over and over. I am a big Orton fan and Batista fan, but personally I would never want to see either man beat the Undertaker. Batista is a great performer but he is neither youthful nore experienced. Orton is going to be a big star in the WWE for a long time to come so it wouldn't be so bad if Taker sorta "passed the torch" on to him. I gotta agree that I would like to see Ken Kennedy face Batista for the World Title. That would make a fine main event.

Benoit and Taker would be a fine match because I think Benoit is the second best wrestler alive today right behind Angle. So I would have no problem with Taker losing to Benoit. The thing that would irk me about it is the fact that these two don't really have anything connecting them so a match wouldn't make any sense. If I had to choose, and I know it would never happen, I would have Taker turn heel first because no one would see it comming. Then have Kane win the title because he deserves a good title run more than any other wrestler alive. Then I don't see why not have Taker and Kane face again at Mania because their last fued didn't even really have a conclusion. They just had their one match and that was it. Then I would have Kane beat Taker at Mania and end it with both wrestlers raising each others hands in the middle of the ring. Taker and Kane could both retire soon after like they plan to.

2006-11-28 13:33:04 · answer #2 · answered by average_joe397 4 · 1 0

I think the Undertaker has been around long enough to go into Wrestlemania against Batista and win the title, even if he loses it the next friday on Smack Down.

2006-11-28 13:16:18 · answer #3 · answered by 90 civic 3 · 0 2

Taker and Impostor Taker. it might purely be a reliable experience whilst unique Kane and unique Undertaker face-off interior the experience. I say make it an Inferno experience to make it extra exciting.

2016-12-14 08:24:30 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Actually, he said kane is the only one who should end his streak. Undertaker losing thatmatch would not be a very good idea.If taker happens to win the rumble, why should he lose at wrestlemania.

2006-11-28 11:25:33 · answer #5 · answered by A.M. 3 · 2 0

He should remain undefeated.He is the greatest wrestler alive today perhaps the best wrestler there ever was.Undertaker can be a brawler,techincal wrestler and high flyer(when he was in his prime).He is the true Phenom,not even AJ Styles is as phenomenal as the Undertaker.

2006-11-28 15:08:23 · answer #6 · answered by WWE Champ 5 · 2 1

AT LAST! SOMEONE WHO KNOWS A TRUE CHAMP WHEN HE SEES ONE! I AGREE WITH ALL THAT YOU SAID. BATISTA IS NOT FIT TO WRESTLE MARK CALLAWAY IN ANY MATCH! WHY?...HE JUST IS'NT A WORTHY OPPONENT! HOW DARE VINCE OR ANYONE ELSE "INSULT" THE UNDERTAKER WITH SOMEONE WHO IS NOT HIS EQUAL!!! ( i don't think he really has an equal in the wwe,or in real life).

2006-11-28 13:43:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I hate Batista i was just happy he got that title of of king Booger anyway i think taker shoukd not end his streak at all let it last for generations he is a ledgend

2006-11-28 10:27:42 · answer #8 · answered by ♥Deadmans Chick♥ 3 · 3 1

Ifi had any say in what the Undertaker was going to do, i would say The Undertaker should kill Ric Flair in his sleep, for real, in real life, with a gunshot to the back of the head

2006-11-28 10:21:15 · answer #9 · answered by thehotdogbun 3 · 1 2

For one, I cannot believe you're taking this so seriously. For two, it's all freakin' staged anyway! Nobody's "losing" to anybody here . . . "veterans" . . . "pro" wrestling is a joke

2006-11-28 10:18:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers