English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

Sadly, I believe are government had everything to do with 9/11. Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence I have been able to find.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

TESTIMONY
There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

This video, obtained by a public interest group, shows the top rear fin of an air craft hiding behind a call box: Whatever is hiding back there, is under 48 ft. long, to small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 ft. long.
http://www.clipaday.com/2006/05/pentagon_plane_crash_from_sept.html

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

2006-11-28 18:27:43 · answer #1 · answered by Joe_Pardy 5 · 0 2

You are right in identifying part of he problem "read the media". The liberal media wants to widen the gulf between the upper class elitists and everyone else. For this reason, they spew false information and propaganda on this issue. The USA is not turning into a fascist, xenophobic, place! In fact, these very same liberals are the driving force behind the socialist movement in our great land! You are very incorrect in your assessment that the beginning of "hatred" started on 9-11. why do you think that the original, illegal, amnesty was in the 80's? Because this has been a HUGE problem for years! RACISM is the last big weapon that the liberals throw at the majority of our society (read Caucasian) when they run out of other arguments. It is a weak attempt to cow the opponent with a last ditch and utterly merit-less effort! Illegal alien is neither a race, nor an ethnicity unto itself, therefor, by definition, one cannot be a racist solely on ones stance against illegal actions of another! September 11 did open the eyes, in a big way, to the bigger problem of illegal aliens and brought to light the danger to our country, on many levels, that illegals represent. represent is incorrect they do not represent problems, as that implies that the problem is something else entirely. THEY ARE THE PROBLEM! Illegals are criminals! It is not open for debate or dispute! and anyone who is pro illegal immigration is pro crime and is therefore, at least passively, an accomplice

2016-05-22 23:09:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yeah. I don't think that Bush & his cronies planned Sept. 11th, but what they had to do with it is simply being completely incompetent. Before he split, Clinton set up a bunch of guys (like Richard Clark) to keep an eye on the terrorism issue (and Bin-what's-his-name) but Dubya didn't want to have anything to do with anyone Clinton put in, so they ignored any and all intelligence that came their way. They were basically scrambling around at that point, grabbing up all the money in site and making tax cuts for rich people, and cutting enviornmental protections, so that certain industries could make more money. They were way too busy to even think about terrorism. So, their stupidity and laziness and greed had a lot to do with Sept. 11th. If we'd had an actual leader in office, they may have been able to stop it before it happened. Oh, well.

2006-11-28 08:59:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

No, and if anyone believes the government had anything to do with 9/11 they are morons.

2006-11-28 20:35:19 · answer #4 · answered by SeahawkFan37 5 · 1 0

Not the US government, no, not at all. Planned, carried out by Muslim extremists. Already debunked by a huge study done by Popular Mechanics with more than 300 credible experts in their respective fields. Google for 9/11 debunking

2006-11-28 09:05:14 · answer #5 · answered by Rich B 5 · 2 2

I think America could have done more to PREVENT 9/11, but i don't think they had anything to do with it.... Actually, they had nothing to do with it at all, cause when Bush got the reports he ignored them.

Bush did exactly what the terrorists wanted him to do. Bush took out Saddam, and that is why the country is in intense war against terrorists now.

2006-11-28 09:01:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Which govt? Our govt did not. 1 or more Islamic govts probably did. The Taliban govt of Afganistan is the most likely suspect. Those countries that recognized the Taliban are next. Every other Islamic dictatorship is also on that list.

2006-11-28 08:59:26 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3 2

Which Government?

2006-11-28 08:55:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

There is no doubt in my mind that the government of Jamaica was responsible for 9/11.

2006-11-28 08:58:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Of course, but I'm not posting the websites with the info again because I was falsely accused of advertising sites that I have nothing to gain from.

The info is all over the web, just google for it.

2006-11-28 09:02:14 · answer #10 · answered by swissmiss620 4 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers