Wow, I have been gone for months and you people are still around.
This war isn't for oil. If it was for oil we would have TAKEN OVER the country and called it America II.
2006-11-28 08:21:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The purpose became, and nonetheless is, to modify the subculture of the middle east. earlier 9/eleven there have been no (0, nada, zip) democracies contained in the middle east. This carry about the region having average 30% unemployment, 40% literacy, and no loose media. it truly is what continually occurs lower than tyrants. It also grew to develop into the international's most well known exporter of terrorism. After 9/eleven, and our next invasions, there at the instantaneous are 2 democracies. Afghanistan and Iraq have many complications nonetheless, yet they are improving swifter than the different countries contained in the region (democracy has that result on people). If we stay contained in the area lengthy adequate to substantiate that both democracies proceed to exist, then the total region will initiate to modify. finally, the middle east will end being the terrorist production unit of the international. in spite of the indisputable fact that, which will absolutely take position if we do not go away, and this is going to take a lengthy time period. you ought to seem on the lengthy-time period image.
2016-11-27 19:35:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No we will leave when the puppet government is set up.
Its like how in Afghanistan before we invaded, the Taliban wouldnt let us put an oil pipeline through their country, so we overthrew them and installed Harmid Karzai as the "President" of Afghanistan and bam got the oil pipeline (he was the former head of Unical the company that needed the pipeline by the way)
So as as soon as these Iraqis settle down and stop killing each other and decide who is going to be the leader of our next puppet government we can leave.
2006-11-28 08:30:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Perplexed 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes we will leave Iraq one day either as winners or as losers
ps if it was about oil why have we not invaded other counties for their oil? and for that matter why even bother with Iraq why not attack a country that does not have a military.
your oil claim is used up bud why not try a new angle?
2006-11-28 08:26:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by TEXAS TREY 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
The oil isn't running very well now. I think the ultimate goal was the protection of Israel.
2006-11-28 08:21:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
The situation is so messy over there, it doesn't seem like we'll ever get out. This would have never happened in the first place if we had never elected Bush, and it is interesting how so many people who supported him originally have taken 6 YEARS to realize that they made a bad choice. However, I don't think the war involves oil.
2006-11-28 08:21:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by pctorab 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
There are maybe four Americans that want to stay in Iraq. The rest want to get the hell out as soon as possible.
The only debate is over what "as soon as possible" means.
2006-11-28 08:43:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jeff S. 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
You realize that because of your honesty you leave yourself open to the charge of Anti-Americanism.
We know it's about oil and super bases in the region. Now What ???
2006-11-28 08:21:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
why do you think its about oil seriously? what has been done to better this country do to us being there and there being oil ? Has any more exports from there gone to the oil companies here? you dont know do you? well the answer is no. look it up.
2006-11-28 08:20:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by CaptainObvious 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Lovely example of a loaded question.
Please read the sources I've supplied. They may help you in the future.
2006-11-28 08:25:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Morningstar2651 4
·
0⤊
0⤋