2006-11-28 08:11:44 · 8 answers · asked by breastfed43 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
invade afghainstan with a more unified force... then go after lebanon or syria NOT iraq
2006-11-28 08:46:51 · answer #1 · answered by jefferson 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To hunt down those directly responsible and bring them to justice. Then, concentrate on developing the intelligence assets necessary to disrupt their organizational structure and prevent further attacks to the greatest degree possible.
You don't cut off the hand to remove a splinter in the thumb, which seems to be our current way of handling things.
.
.
2006-11-28 16:39:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Exactly what happened, but with two key differences:
1.) Use the opportunity to encourage Americans to make sacrifices in the form of higher taxes (instead of borrowing money from the Chinese to pay for the war), higher enlistment rates, and lower fuel consumption.
2.) Don't invade Iraq. Duh.
2006-11-28 16:57:55 · answer #3 · answered by Jeff S. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A unified continent fighting against terrorism which we had in Afghanastan and promptly lost by invading Iraq.
2006-11-28 16:17:30 · answer #4 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
An outright obliteration of every terror faction in the Middle East. Regardless of political correctness.
2006-11-28 16:14:52 · answer #5 · answered by only p 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Invading afghanistan. Oh, wait, we did that.
2006-11-28 16:14:17 · answer #6 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
swift and mind numbing violence toward all known terrorist camps globally.
2006-11-28 16:23:33 · answer #7 · answered by slabsidebass 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
have no clue
2006-11-28 16:15:03 · answer #8 · answered by Texas Boy 213 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋