Why is it that the United States congress never has any physical fights, as in parliaments of other countries?

Answer 1

Although it might surprise you, it's because our representative bodies are operating in a "mature" system, for want of a better word. The fights you talk about, (we've all seen 'em) are occurring such places as Japan (system in place since 1946), various states that are former SSR's (system in place since late '80's) Korea (system in place since mid 40's)

In contrast, our Senate and House date back to the 1780's, and if you do look back we had our share of physical stuff earlier too. In the early 1800's it was not uncommon for legislators to challenge each other to duels. Then the most notorious example was the brutal caning that Congressman Preston Brooks gave to Senator Charles Sumner right on the Senate floor because of Sumner's outspoken abolitionism.

It is noteworthy that the nation with the longest continuous representative system of government, Iceland, has no known occurrences of such antics.

Answer 2

There are more advantageous than 2 political activities contained in the u . s ., issue is they don't get very many votes. there is the fairway party (keep in mind Ralph Nader?) or the Libertarian party. regularly situations those 0.33 activities are attractive to a small crew of electorate which have a particular pastime. In idea 2 activities is wise to me me, you've one representing a conservative regulations and one representing liberal regulations. that ought to conceal the spectrum i wager. i'm not particular yet a independant ought to were in congress earlier. Founding fathers have not something to do with the renowned party gadget. It in simple terms did not exist decrease back then.

Answer 3

Fisticuffs could boost the ratings of CSpan. Good idea!

Answer 4

Because they're all older than the dinosaurs.

Answer 5

They take themselves too seriously.

Answer 6

becuse repubs have manners and libs are pu$$ys

Answer 7

They have. Anti-Bellum period.