2006-11-28 07:48:02 · 28 answers · asked by clara m 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Yes. She kind of took everything for granted.
2006-11-28 07:49:52 · answer #1 · answered by ♥ 6 · 0⤊ 7⤋
She produced 2 heirs, one the future King that everyone is crazy about. Whinny baby? I don't think so. Charles, the bat earred kilted one, is the whinny one...in need of a mama. Diane was a lovely, gracious, style setter who was the most photographed woman in the world. She upstaged Charles without even trying...and he was jealous of that easy charm she had.
No, of course I don't agree with your assessment and think you are ill bred for damning the dead lady. Who does that? Tabloids who make blood and guts money and ten cent heads that buy and believe them....
2006-11-28 08:54:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
All the Royals are whinny babies. What about Charlie and his complaint that he finds it very difficult to live on 9 million quid a year. These people would be a joke if they weren't so sickening.
2006-11-28 09:59:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jealous, much?
She was human. She had a heart and wanted and expected love out of her marriage. She was led to believe that she WAS loved until the wedding was done, then she found out he had his own life. Perhaps, growing up priveleged, in England, yes, she was a bit daft not to realize that being a Royal was something out of your control. You could never live your life FOR YOU again. You would ALWAYS have every shopping trip, every time you ran to the store, every time you saw your girlfriend, every time you ATE, written down for history, SERIOUSLY. Now, wouldn't that grate on your nerves after a while?
Someone always taking notes on where your going, who your with, why your doing it?
Do us all a favor and shut the **** up. Charles grew up in this bubble world, he knows nothing else, when your just a normal person, marrying into it is more than you expect.
2006-11-28 07:53:45 · answer #4 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
unfortunately, princess diana had a lot of emotional and self image problems from her childhood. For most of her married life, she was very unhappy. It's sad because right before her death, it seemed like she was starting to get he life together. I don't think she was an idiot, she's one of the most beloved celebrities in the world!!! She was just a normal person with normal problems, who happend to be the princess of wales.
2006-11-28 07:51:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Yes, she was a pathetic little snot. What I can't get over is that people actually think she did a thing to help the misfortunate. Patting some dying African kid on the head while cameras snap away is not helping. Helping would have been giving her un-earned money to charitable causes.
2006-11-28 12:43:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is easy to talk about about a person who has passed away ,but i would like u to know she was rich after wards she came from a middle class family and she was A teacher lets see if u were rich right now what would u have wasted all your money in? well let me answer that for u well i bet not helping children all over the world like she did helping children with aids hunger and lots more she was a humble person living with an asshole prince who only cared for his own *** and made her even want to kill her self so if u call that life great well u deserve to be married with an asshole like prince Charles "Don't judge if u are not the one in that situation"
2006-11-28 08:43:22 · answer #7 · answered by jocysoul 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't think she was idiot, but she wasn't very smart either. She had a lot of emotional problems even before she was married. Maybe she thought her marriage was a love match instead arranged. She just couldn't handle or cope well with realty.
2006-11-29 10:15:04 · answer #8 · answered by Sunshine Suzy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, don't agree with anything you said except the fact that she wasn't homeless. I don't see how you can say a bunch of stuff about a person when you never even knew them.....
2006-11-28 13:34:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not even! She was an amazing woman who did a great deal for victims of mines, AIDS, homeless, she was an amazing ballett dancer, an amazing swimmer, an adoring Mother......maybe you haven't bothered to read more about her before judging. THat is a terrible quality in YOU!
2006-11-28 07:51:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No I do not. She gave a lot of charity and she was a good mother to Princes Harry and William. I am related to her, too, she is my aunt on my fathers side through the Spencers. she was a good person and she deserves credit becuase it is difficult being Royalty
2006-11-28 08:04:36 · answer #11 · answered by ihaveaquestion 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋