WlLL HISTORIANS BLAME BUSH FOR THE CIVIL WAR IN IRAQ?

Answer 1

No they will blame the Democrats for being cowards. Cowardace always makes the bullies stronger and meaner.

Answer 2

Historians will not blame President Bush for Civil war in Iraq. The Bush haters, including the press, continue to try and find something to beat him over the head with but it only shows their ignorance. What you are now seeing is the natural results of an opressed society suddenly freed from tyrannical rule.
When an entire society has been oppressed for thirty years, all that remains are the very basic structures of their previous lives, ie: Sunni, Shia and Kurds. Since Saddam was a Sunni and they persecuted the other two during Saddam's tenure, what you see now is the settling of old scores and nothing more than gangs fighting for the top of the pecking order.
If you were to be given a true rendition (You will not get it from the media - blood sells!)of what is happening today all over Iraq, you would see that there is enormous progress in many areas. The trouble spots are of no more overall significance than the Gang/vice/drug areas of any US City. The violence must be stopped eventually, and it will be contained, eventually, by Iraqis

Answer 3

In a civil war, no single man or entity is blameworthy. There is equal responsibility on the heads of both the American and Iraqi leadership, as well as on a number of other contributors. The current situation is a combination of poor American planning, petty hatred among religious factions in Iraq, and deliberate sabatoge to facilitate such a situation by outside elements such as Al Qaeda.

As much as people may dislike Bush and the Iraq war, this situation was going to come to a head regardless of Bush's efforts, simply because of the festering hatred in the Middle East that was waiting for a catalyst.

This is why I agree with the war. It may have been embarked upon for less than wise reasons, but it was nonetheless necessary that we maintain a strong presence there. As bad as it is over there, it is nonetheless controlled, and terrorist attacks against Americans are carried out against soldiers, not civilians; my point being that if there must be terrorist strikes, I think our soldiers are best equipped to deal with them.

I can't say for certain what historians will say about Bush, because this story is long from over. By the end of this, Bush could be either the biggest failure the world has ever seen, or conversely be the most influential western leader of our time.

Time will tell. So rather than us all villifying those who appear to be worthless, we should take a step back and look at things in perspective.

Answer 4

Yes, He will most likely either blame Bush or the generals on the ground responsible for keeping the peace. Either way, Judging from what I have seen so far, he would unlikely be willing to take responsibility even though he is Commander and Chief of the armed forces. However, be assured that if Iraq does work its way out he will be the first to take credit for it. His handlers will probably have the media focus on domestic issues and refer to the civil war as isolated instances violence perpetrated by extremists." The media will report and Obama will give a "speach" saying the "civil war" is actually small "isolated pockets of resistance but that the situation in "under-control." The media will support this spin through there commentary and opinion sections. Obama doesn't want the media to touch the wars with a ten foot pole and for the most part, the media has played right into his hands. He is no-drama-Obama because there isn't allot of critical reporting being done out there on him so far "with exception of partisan outlets."

Answer 5

Peter Hart, known for his non partisan poll for NBC and The Wall Street Journal, has conducted public-opinion research for thirty governors and forty U.S. senators, from Hubert Humphrey to Jay Rockefeller.

"When all is said and done, how will Bush be remembered politically?"

Hart: "The Bush presidency will be at the bottom of the heap, period. It will be not only a presidency without accomplishments but a presidency that put America on the wrong track. This is an administration that knew how to play politics but didn't understand the sweep of history. The next administration and the administration after that will be digging out from everything that Bush has left us in. Iraq, civil liberties, human rights, basic domestic policies -- in each and every case, they played the political card rather than the American card."

Answer 6

American history won't for 100 years (this was proved by how long it has taken us to admit we were first to strike in the Mexican/American war) but the rest of the world will.. and eventually we will as well.

Answer 7

Bush didnt start the war. Your congress did.

Learn!! I wont hurt you I promise.

Answer 8

All the French ones

Answer 9

100 % ....
who 2 blame .....
he was the 1 to start the war......
except the americans ....
every one would blame himm

Answer 10

Yes they will. It's not fair and it's not right, but history is written by the media, and the media hates bush.