English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-28 07:35:05 · 5 answers · asked by mimi 2 in Arts & Humanities History

5 answers

I think he was a big abolitionist who planned to go to Virginia and start a Slave Uprising against their masters that, according to his plan, would catch on with all the other slaves all over the South and slavery would end by the slaves violently turning on whites.

John Brown and his hundred or so followers went to Falls Church, VA and took some hostages at train station one night. The Army was called in and John Brown's uprising was thwarted before it even began.

John Brown was arrested and later hung for his actions. He was the biggest Martyr for the abolitionist cause and the song "John Brown's body is a rolling in his grave" became their anthem.

I don't think John Brown single-handedly started the civil war but his actions certainly added fuel to the fire and further divided the North and South as he represented the southernors greatest fear of their slaves one day violently turning on them.

2006-11-28 07:49:36 · answer #1 · answered by orzoff 4 · 0 0

He led an armed rebellion against the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry, WV. He tried to lead a slave rebellion. It didn't directly cause the Civil War but it was one of the causes leading up to the Civil War. The North and the South had different reactions to it.

2006-11-28 07:54:18 · answer #2 · answered by harveymac1336 6 · 0 0

I would not say John Brown "caused the civil war." As an abolitionist, the confrontational tactics he used brought the issue of slavery to the forefront.

"His belief in confrontation led him to murder five pro-slavery southerners in what became known as the Pottawatomie Massacre in May 1856. Brown's most famous deed was the 1859 raid he led on the federal armory at Harpers Ferry, Virginia (in modern-day West Virginia). Brown's subsequent capture by federal forces, his trial for treason to the state of Virginia, and his execution by hanging were an important part of the origins of the American Civil War, which followed sixteen months later. . ."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Brown_(abolitionist)

"JOHN BROWN'S RAID
On October 16, 1859, the radical abolitionist John Brown led a small group of followers in a raid on the Arsenal. Brown attacked and captured several buildings; he hoped to use the captured weapons to initiate a slave uprising throughout the South. However, he and his men were quickly pinned down by local citizens and militia, and forced to take refuge in the fire house adjacent to the arsenal. On October 18, U.S. Marines were sent via train to Harpers Ferry.[1] Under the command of Colonel Robert E. Lee, they stormed the fire house and killed or captured most of the raiders. Brown was tried for treason by the State of Virginia, convicted, and hanged in nearby Charles Town. The failed raid was a major catalyst in accelerating the slide to Civil War."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harpers_Ferry,_West_Virginia

2006-11-28 07:57:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

JB did cause the civil war

He wanted to incite a slave revolt. He and less than a dozen of his followers tried to take over the federal arsenal at Harper's Ferry in what was then Va. now West Va.. He want slaves to rise up / kill their / masters and then join him.

He held for a few days until US Army General Lee, yes - Robert E., showed with a force of sufficient strength to quell this uprising.

JBs action was the fear of all southern slave holders,
They began to talk about leaving the union once again after this event.

2006-11-28 07:58:18 · answer #4 · answered by Irish Wander 3 · 0 1

no longer close. in case you have one maximum severe reason, i might argue it became into the upward thrust of the Republican occasion (a clean political occasion on the time). it is annoying to entice close now, with occasion re-alignments, however the south became into until very those days exceptionally lots an excellent bloc vote for the conservative, precise-of-middle occasion, the Democrats. immediately the slavery subject is known-approximately basically in terms of ethical/ethical grounds, yet on the time, the southern states had already ceded a definite volume of political skill interior the Massachusetts Compromise, wherein they had agreed to count quantity slaves as 3/5 of a individual for purposes of delineating how many Congressmen each and every state became into allowed. inhabitants advance interior the north over the an prolonged time extra eroded southern political skill, which meant that the south felt their often cotton-based agrarian financial gadget became into bearing an unfairly large % of the tax burden, and now alongside comes a political occasion this is extremely radical. those Republicans attempt to stack the deck much greater politically, proscribing slavery in new states, which will mean that the southern cotton-grower can see extensive tarriffs on cotton interior the close to destiny. there is even some communicate of getting rid of slavery altogether, which might smash the south's financial gadget. there is not any communicate of procuring the slaves, and the bill of Rights demands the government to atone for the taking of inner maximum sources,offering financial counsel in restructuring the financial gadget, or changing congressional illustration. In different words, they're going to trash the form and screw the south. no longer too some years until now, countless New England states had seen secession while the shoe became into on the different foot economically, yet desperate to stay interior the Union while political compromises have been reached, yet such compromises now looked puzzling at terrific, and, on account that no person yet those upstart radical Republicans had ever doubted the authority of the states to seceed, they did so with a life like expectation of doing so peacefully. Miscalculation. as a substitute they're invaded militarily and function maximum of their wealth stripped from them, to no longer point out political illustration, over the subsequent quarter century.

2016-12-10 17:51:32 · answer #5 · answered by raper 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers