That was a graet movie... the story was brillient how that girl was related to jesus, and how mary was burried in that pyrimid thing. i love movies like that that actually make me think
2006-11-28 07:35:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't say I was blown away by The Da Vinci Code - as is often the case, the book was far superior. I generally like Tom Hanks in almost all his roles, however I found that I had such a pre-conception of what Robert Langdon should be, that it took me about half an hour to get used to Hanks occupying this character. Once I settled into it though - it was a thoroughly enjoyable, occasionally slow moving thriller. Having read the book, I did have a knowledge of the various groups and factions involved - I'm not sure how someone who hasn't read the book will fair though. The casting of the movie is surely one of it's stronger points - Paul Bettany is almost unrecognisable and plays the menacing single minded Silas to utter perfection. Sir Ian McKellan too, it totally fantastic, and really steals most scene's he appears in. He delivers some great one liners too - a real character actor playing a real character. Audrey Tautou is as we have come to expect, just lovely, and who else could have played Bezu Fache - Jean Reno was made for the role. As you'd expect from a Ron Howard Production, there is a good amount of cheese, especially towards the end. Langdon's "Godspeed" caused me to awake in the night sweating! I am a fairly harsh marker on the IMDb, so don't be put off by a 6 out of 10 - I did enjoy the movie, but my anticipation was so great with this film, that it could never live up to my expectation.
2006-11-28 16:47:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by yu3se6 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bogus! Dan Brown's "facts" wouldn't stand up to any kind of historical scrutiny. Don't take his word for it, do the research yourself. Christ was never married. The Bible as history stands up way more than the documents used by Dan Brown, written hundreds of years later. What did they know?
Read at this site to see some of the inaccuracies in this film / book.
2006-11-29 12:02:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by BaseballGrrl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The book was far better than the movie, although Tom Hanks is a great actor
2006-11-28 15:40:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by dannyyii_p 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was great, glad I watched it a long time after I read the book. Sophie was well cast.
2006-11-29 03:18:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Richo Fev 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I liked it for the most part, it was hard for me to follow because I had 3 kids running around as I tried to watch it, so I had to keep stopping and rewinding....blah
2006-11-28 15:28:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by TaureanAngel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the book was so much better. I hope his next movie "Angels & Demons" is just like the book. if it is then it will be a great movie!
2006-11-28 15:32:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chuy V1.08 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think this Dan Brown thing is just a trend.. and it will die out soon.
Dont get me wrong.. the movie was awesome and it was nice to see diffrent sides of the religon.
2006-11-28 15:27:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by orlyandsa 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
OOOOOOO Haven't seen it yet but i want to really bad
2006-11-28 15:33:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by pink girl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Book was better.
2006-11-28 15:26:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Darian D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋