Do you see a difference?
.
2006-11-28 06:34:16 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
YES
A major difference is in the censorship of information. I frequently have News broadcasts blocked by Alerts from the emergency broadcast system. A typical jam of the system goes something like this ( Today Sunni gunme bzzzzt bzzzzt bzzzzt THIS IS A TEST)
One day while watching BBC there were 5 emergency broadcast tests.
Compare that to open and free information in 2000. I remember watching a History program about digging up relics from Babylon. Looked pretty normal. Even the Hans Blick WMD searches were fairly normal Baghdad was a thriving prosperous community.
Go big Red Go
2006-11-28 07:16:51 · answer #1 · answered by 43 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NBC announced yesterday that the conflict in Iraq could officially be catagorized as a "civil war". I'd say overall they are showing the true side of the war now, as opposed to mostly propaganda before the war.
2006-11-28 14:38:00 · answer #2 · answered by Samuel Crow 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Any news service first and foremost duty is to inform and discover...there are no real investigative journalists anymore, or very few. America sure needs them now more than ever.
2006-11-28 14:40:12 · answer #3 · answered by dstr 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, there are more negatives about the war in media especially in CNN.
2006-11-28 14:42:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
i am more concerned about the coverage of Afghanistan.
2006-11-28 14:41:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No difference. It was biased and incorrect then and it is biased and incorrect now. They have been consist ant though.
2006-11-28 14:36:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋