Why did they ban OJ's book and tv special?

Question

I really want to know what he could possibly say that will make anyone believe he didn't do it. I really wanted to read the book but now that it is banned, no one will ever know what he has to say. What are your thoughts?

I in no way support this psycho for the record. I am just curious to what he is up to. I understand everyone is in an uproar about it and that is probably why I am so curious to what he is saying in this book. I obviously haven't read the book so I was just wondering if anyone else knew.

Answer 1

OJ may well have revealed information pointing to his innocence or guilt, As found "not guilty" by a jury then he at least deserves to be heard and hopefully the book and interview will be available later on as a CHOICE for anyone to either check it out or not.
Money not narcissism was probably the motivation in writing the book. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or even found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see a large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.

Answer 2

There was a public outcry against it, so the head of Fox, Rupert Murdock, canned the project. No one wants OJ to make any money off of the murder of 2 people. No one wants to hear anything from this man, because most people believe he was guilty of these two murders, even though he was not found guilty by a jury. There were too many things that got screwed up during the trial. I'm curious to know why you are interested in reading this book? No judgement here, just wondering.

Answer 3

Neither was "banned." The publisher cancelled the release of the book and Fox tv cancelled the special because they couldn't find sponsors for it. No doubt, the most sensational parts of the book will be leaked in the near future.

Answer 4

i'm very delighted. How disqusted i replaced into bearing directly to the completed be counted. the assumption-approximately extra torment to the households and his very own toddlers replaced into only straightforward indecent incredibly for a pair of greenbacks. And to the writer, even the tabloids had extra effective experience. FOX would desire to take a sturdy look and according to probability sparkling a sprint domicile for letting this even take place.

Answer 5

Think about it. If Nicole Simpson or Ron Goldberg were your relatives and were murdered. The killer gets off scott free and then writes a book about it. Would you buy the book then or be pissed about it?? Not very many people are happy about this book.

Answer 6

I'm sure you can get a bootlegged copy on eBay or somewhere.

Answer 7

he did it for the money that was advanced to him. HE DID NOT KILL THEM, THE DOPEMAN DID!
however, it was tacky to write a book, considering it was his kids mother.
they banned it because of public outcry!

Answer 8

you do know that in the book he describes how he "would have" killed them, don't you ... my thoughts are: that is just so wrong on his part ...

Answer 9

We already know what he did, why would I want to hear what his side is.

Answer 10

CAUSE IT WAS WRONG!!!!