In all the pitches of culture: from lyotard to Habermas, to someone who tried to define that way of thinking. fonts are really important. thanks
2006-11-28
06:02:54
·
3 answers
·
asked by
diogene_cinico
3
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
for pedestal:
thank you for the answer, and sorry if i go deeper. what i understand of your definition is that post modern is simply the call of everything way to think everything else; also, i think that is really difficult to talk about modernism without including post.modernism in it. Post modern i think is another part of modernism project, that have not a failure with the world wars or the globalization or terrorism: for real, these are simply its developements i think. Like this, post modernism is only another narration called from lyotard in order to giustify is ignorance about this society. but this society is simplier more difficult like the ancient modern-state, because we are more, we are more rich, we are more involved in state life. In fact, the way to live is not different from late '800: yes, the problem are different, but the way to think it in terms of presence is only a conseguence of the metaphisical point of wiev, that Heidegger clearly explained. continue---->
2006-11-28
08:51:22 ·
update #1
-->. post modernism is the late crusching of early 900 sociology, that has really failed, and marxist thinking of '70. That has no implication with the real situation of thinking, that remained the same but bigger. There is not only a philosopher for an era now, but are all philosophers; and this created also this low thinkers. sorry for my english, i hope you will understand it.
2006-11-28
08:52:01 ·
update #2