English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

It should be, but it won't be...
because politicians don't like to talk about issues that are of real importance to our country.
They will focus on the flaws of their political opponents; flag-burning; gay marriage; abortion; right-to-die; and what color to repaint the White House.
They will NOT discuss: their own flaws and shortcomings; their own incompetence; the corrupted two-party political system that no longer allows voters any real choice; an incorrigible, greedy, contemptible, corrupt U.S. Congress; an unconstitutional and illegal war in Iraq that should be abandoned; a pompous and arrogant judicial system that is anything but fair; a government bureaucracy that is out of control; waste and fraudulent spending within all agencies of government; the perilously dangerous federal debt which will put America in bankruptcy sooner than later; illicit pork-barrel spending and the 'let's make a deal' mentality in Congress; the need for term limits for all elected officials; corporate welfare; white collar crime; all the child molesters, pedophiles, prescription-drug abusers, liars, wife beaters, homosexuals, and even murderers in Congress.
Need I go on? -RKO-

2006-11-28 05:56:48 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2 1

It *should* be. Young people (16 to 26) should be *particularly* concerned as they are the ones who get to pay back the money (with their taxes) that we're spending today. In other words, Bush's "tax cuts" are essentially a tax increase passed on to the next generation.

But unfortunately, the Middle East is *completely* unravelling. Civil war in Iraq betwen Sunnis and Shiites, Iran and Syria ready to jump in pick up the pieces, Kurds wanting to form a new Kurdistan, with possible spillover into a Kurdish war in Turkey, civil war in Lebanon, and things going so cozy between Israel and the Palestinians.

This Administration is doing such a *heckuva* job in the middle east, the next president will be inheriting a *nightmare*.

2006-11-28 18:59:05 · answer #2 · answered by c_sense_101 2 · 1 0

I learn each and every candidate heavily on key topics that are seriously substantial to problematical operating human beings and note the position they stand on those topics. the first situation is the monetary gadget, the unemployment price is now 5.5 %. cost of gas and foodstuff had lengthy gone up and those who do no longer make lots money are suffering. * in a unmarried city on my own there is better than 600 homes in foreclosure because the authorities doesn't help the human beings. Many lobbist in Washington are element of the placement. The lobbist contained in the the Republican get mutually are contained in the interest of the elite, those who owns oil organizations, pharmaceutical comp. The lobbist do no longer pick to pay lots tax, so the midsection classification is suffering because they ought to pay extra tax than the wealthy. 3, college is severe priced and the loans organizations are creating wealth on the students. 4. Healthcare and coverage is a situation, many human beings won't be able to have adequate money coverage, fantastically low earnings familes. 5, the conflict, it takes 10 billion in line with month to stay in Iraq. The politics in Washing ton needs to be fixed and the midsection classification households needs to get a ruin from paying better taxes than the wealthy. Senator Obama says that those are the topics that the county face. i believe that by ability of senator Clinton and different democrats, the topics such foreclosure, health insurcance, saftety and the severe priced conflict will be make sure. yet they ought to clean up the mess first. i believe the democrats will carry alterations because they are contained in the interest of the human beings, no longer contained in the insterest of the lobbist or the elite or the oil industries. they could carry alterations in many human beings's life who're now suffering. as POW he voted hostile to a bill which will provide squaddies extra reward in time period of ending their college for free. ultimately, the republicans also vote hostile to a bill which will shrink the cost of gas on the problematical operating human beings because they make income on the oil marketplace. They artwork for lobbyist mostly. i realized that Obama has the flair to carry substitute in this usa in healthcare, monetary gadget, preparation the position he helps with scholarships, and faculty loans. OBAMA 2008 because he cares about hardworking human beings. Who will vote for?

2016-11-29 21:34:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not really since there are so many other terribly important issues to worry about like the safety of American Citizens!

2006-11-28 09:49:11 · answer #4 · answered by TRUE GRIT 5 · 0 0

not unless there is some negative change in it. it has shrunk by a third in the last 3 years. the news will not allow this to become well known for fear of making a republican look good. unless the economy takes a dive it will not be an issue at all. just as in our recent elections.

2006-11-28 08:02:43 · answer #5 · answered by karl k 6 · 1 2

Absolutely! The "borrow & spend" method of running a country is running us straight into the ground.

2006-11-28 08:23:31 · answer #6 · answered by missusjonz 4 · 0 1

I believe it should be an issue, just not the top issue.

Thank you very much, while you're up.

2006-11-28 05:59:53 · answer #7 · answered by producer_vortex 6 · 2 0

No, I would say national seciurity.

But the government spends far too much, I agree.

2006-11-28 05:49:40 · answer #8 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1 1

It won't but it should be, especially since this administration demonizes the Democrats on taxes.

Fiscal responsibility is what we need.

2006-11-28 08:19:38 · answer #9 · answered by txwebber 3 · 1 1

YES!

2006-11-28 05:46:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers