English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what was his personality like?

2006-11-28 05:18:32 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

4 answers

Because the earlier generals were even bigger idiots than he was and he was promoted on the 'peter principle' - everyone is promoted to a rank beyond their ability. Oops, perhaps I shouldn't say that, as recent historians have tried to rehabilitate him. He has been generally reviled in the past for allowing so many millions of men to go to their deaths unnecessarily in futile 'big pushes' which were doomed to failure. He and other commanders failed to take heed of the stupidity of ordering men to attack trenches heavily defended by machine guns and also failed for a long time to take advantage of the benefits offered by the tanks invented by the British. It is said that he was a deeply religious man and had difficulty in reconciling this faith with the carnage of the Western Front. In the end, you read the sources and make up your own mind.

2006-11-28 05:58:13 · answer #1 · answered by rdenig_male 7 · 0 0

from a long way back if all the history is correct and his personality well about the same as all those kind of people about that time! very severe !!

2006-11-28 13:41:33 · answer #2 · answered by srracvuee 7 · 0 0

with a very very big whip

2006-11-28 13:27:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hope this helps

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Haig,_1st_Earl_Haig

2006-11-28 13:26:33 · answer #4 · answered by benny fica 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers